2016
DOI: 10.1111/eva.12372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transmissible cancers, are they more common than thought?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(9 reference statements)
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A sexually transmitted venereal tumor was reported in dogs (Murgia, Pritchard, Kim, Fassati, & Weiss, 2006) while malignant cells of facial tumors were identified to be transmitted by biting in Tasmanian devils (Pearse & Swift, 2006). Two key elements of transmissible cancer emergence are the survival of malignant cells during transmission from host to host and the resistance to immune attacks in the new host (Ujvari, Gatenby, & Thomas, 2016). From a mammal‐centered point of view, with cells unable to survive in the external environment and with a highly effective self‐recognition system, it looks like incredibly difficult conditions to meet, well explaining the rarity of contagious cancers.…”
Section: Transmissible Cancers Might Be More Widespread Than Previousmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A sexually transmitted venereal tumor was reported in dogs (Murgia, Pritchard, Kim, Fassati, & Weiss, 2006) while malignant cells of facial tumors were identified to be transmitted by biting in Tasmanian devils (Pearse & Swift, 2006). Two key elements of transmissible cancer emergence are the survival of malignant cells during transmission from host to host and the resistance to immune attacks in the new host (Ujvari, Gatenby, & Thomas, 2016). From a mammal‐centered point of view, with cells unable to survive in the external environment and with a highly effective self‐recognition system, it looks like incredibly difficult conditions to meet, well explaining the rarity of contagious cancers.…”
Section: Transmissible Cancers Might Be More Widespread Than Previousmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and the resistance to immune attacks in the new host (Ujvari, Gatenby, & Thomas, 2016). From a mammal-centered point of view, with cells unable to survive in the external environment and with a highly effective self-recognition system, it looks like incredibly difficult conditions to meet, well explaining the rarity of contagious cancers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the metastatic process, paracrine signaling and chemotaxis between the soil (novel tissue) and the seed (malignant cell) lead to tissue tropism of metastatic cells and the invasion of specific organs . Stromal environments accommodating novel tumors can arise by manipulation at each site of tumor metastasis . However, an interesting question concerning both metastatic processes and transmissible cancers is whether the evolved (clonally selected) abnormal stromal cells (“fellow‐travellers”), which provide an optimal niche for primary tumor cells, accompany the invasive malignant cells during invasion of new organs and/or other host organisms .…”
Section: Host Manipulation By Cancer Cells: What Are the Facts And Exmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…according to the somatic mutation theory each cancer must “reinvent the wheel” because their evolutionary products die with the host (but see ). Conversely, in the cases of contagious cancers, fitness is not restricted by host death, allowing for a longer evolutionary history involving coevolutionary processes with the host species . Given this ecological and evolutionary context, theory postulates that lineages able, like classic parasitic organisms (see Box 2), to manipulate phenotypic traits in their host in ways that favor their proliferation and/or transmission to novel hosts (for contagious cancers) should achieve higher fitness, and consequently be favored by selection.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%