Dear Editor, Neuronal apoptosis is considered to be essential for brain development and neurodegenerative disorders and has been a major focus in cell biological and neuroscientific studies since its first recognition a century ago [1]. Remarkable progress has been made in defining the molecular and cellular pathways underlying neuronal apoptosis during the past decade [2], however, it remains relatively unclear about the physiological functions of apoptosis in neural development. The neurotrophin hypothesis proposes that immature neurons compete for trophic factors that are derived from target neurons in limited supply and that only neurons that successfully establish synaptic connections with their targets would receive trophic support to survive [3]. Although this model is appealing in predicting neuronal survival, it does not explain how to trigger neuronal apoptosis in the absence of trophic factors. Moreover, the neurotrophin hypothesis may not apply to the model organism such as Caenorhabditis elegans in which the canonic nerve growth factors have not been reported yet.Alternative models can be valuable to illustrate the physiological function of neuronal apoptosis. Among the 1,090 somatic cells generated during the development of the C. elegans hermaphrodite, 131 cells undergo programmed cell death [4]; and 105 of the 131 apoptotic cells are derived from neuronal cell lineages. Intriguingly, many neuronal apoptotic events in C. elegans are coupled with asymmetric cell divisions (ACDs): neuroblast asymmetric division produces a small daughter cell that undergoes apoptosis and a large daughter cell that differentiates or divides and differentiates into neurons ( Figure 1A for Q neuroblast lineages). The recent finding about the segregation of aggresomes during asymmetric divisions suggests another possible model for the function of neuronal apoptosis [5]. Perhaps in C. elegans neuroblast lineages, misfolded proteins asymmetrically segregate to the daughter cell that is destined to die. Similarly, factors that may inhibit neuronal differentiation may be asymmetrically inherited by the apoptotic daughter cell for degradation. The "asymmetric segregation" model would assume that neuronal apoptosis removes misfolded protein or differentiation inhibitors, maintaining the fitness of neurons or promoting neuronal differentiation. This model can be examined by inhibiting neuroblast cytokinesis: if aggresomes or differentiation inhibitors could not be segregated, the defects of neuronal differentiation or function should be expected in adult nematodes. However, this model was previously difficult to be tested because of the lack of genetic tools to manipulate neuroblast cytokinesis in live animals.To provide some tangible evidence for the "asymmetric segregation" hypothesis, we here applied two approaches to generate conditional mutations or a weak mutant allele that disrupts neuroblast cytokinesis but allows animal to survive ( Figure 1B). We chose to target an evolutionarily conserved cytokinetic scaffold protein...