2012
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.46
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translocator Protein (18 kDa) Polymorphism (rs6971) Explains in-vivo Brain Binding Affinity of the PET Radioligand [18F]-FEPPA

Abstract: [ 18 F]-FEPPA binds to the 18-kDa translocator protein (TSPO) and is used in positron emission tomography (PET) to detect microglial activation. However, quantitative interpretations of the PET signal with new generation TSPO PET radioligands are confounded by large interindividual variability in binding affinity. This presents as a trimodal distribution, reflecting high-affinity binders (HABs), low-affinity binder (LAB), and mixed-affinity binders (MABs). Here, we show that one polymorphism (rs6971) located i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
132
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(30 reference statements)
5
132
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The frequencies of this polymorphism vary across ethnic groups, with Caucasians having the highest frequency for LABs (HAB:MAB:LAB 5 49:42:9) compared with African Americans (56:38:6) and Han Chinese and Japanese (94:6:0.001). Our hypothesis that the rs6971 polymorphism explained the large betweensubject variability seen with second-generation TSPO PET ligands was consistent with early imaging data from our group (14) and with data showing differences between HAB and MAB binding for TSPO ligands, 18 F-FEPPA, and 11 C-PBR28 (9,15).…”
supporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The frequencies of this polymorphism vary across ethnic groups, with Caucasians having the highest frequency for LABs (HAB:MAB:LAB 5 49:42:9) compared with African Americans (56:38:6) and Han Chinese and Japanese (94:6:0.001). Our hypothesis that the rs6971 polymorphism explained the large betweensubject variability seen with second-generation TSPO PET ligands was consistent with early imaging data from our group (14) and with data showing differences between HAB and MAB binding for TSPO ligands, 18 F-FEPPA, and 11 C-PBR28 (9,15).…”
supporting
confidence: 76%
“…In the past 5 y, a substantial number (.50) of second-generation TSPO ligands have been proposed, including 18 F-PBR111, 11 C-PBR28, 18 F-FEPPA ( 18 F-N-2-(2-fluoroethoxy)benzyl)-N-(4-phenoxypyridin-3-yl)acetamide), and 11 C-DPA713 ( 11 C-N,N-diethyl-2-[2-(4-methoxyphenyl)-5,7-dimethyl-pyrazolo [1,5-a]pyrimidin-3-yl]-acetamide) (7)(8)(9)(10). Although these ligands were claimed to have increased delivery across the blood-brain barrier or a higher signal-to-noise ratio than 11 C-(R)-PK11195, initial human studies have demonstrated considerable variability in their binding across subjects, including the presence of the so-called nonbinders, healthy subjects who demonstrated very little if any binding of 11 C-PBR28 (8).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the HABs, V T showed high variability that could be related to K 1 higher variability in that group, compared with MABs (Table 1). Such variability in HABs has already been reported for other tracers, namely 18 F-PBR111 (5) and 18 F-FEPPA (22). As described in Guo et al (5), we checked here if age or injected mass could influence the binding of radiotracers to TSPO but we found no correlation between those variables and ligand binding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…and [(18)F]-FEPPA for imaging brain inflammation have been linked to this polymorphism (88,(93)(94)(95)(96). However, structural analyses have shown that A147T TSPO is able to retain the same structural profile as the wild-type protein, and binds the first generation TSPO ligand, PK 11195, with comparable affinity (97).…”
Section: Complications In the Application Of Certain Tspo Pet Ligandsmentioning
confidence: 99%