2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translocal assemblages: Space, power and social movements

Abstract: . (2009) 'Translocal assemblages : space, power and social movements. ', Geoforum., 40 (4). pp. 561-567.Further information on publisher's website:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum. 2009.05.003 Publisher's copyright statement:Additional information: Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
251
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 397 publications
(278 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
251
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Infrastructure has tended to be understood through the dichotomy of formality and informality (Varley, 2013) yet new approaches are shifting our understandings to consider alternative forms of infra-structure that are heterogenous and hybrid, consisting of standard hardware, improvised technologies (Silver, 2014) and people them-selves (Simone, 2004a). This work draws attention to what Furlong (2014: 139) terms the, Ôcoexistence among sociotechnical systems, as opposed to the universality of a single dominant infrastructure networkÕ alongside the everyday practices that (re)make infra-structure space across various socio-material conÞgurations (McFarlane, 2009;Silver, 2014;Simone, 2004a). This growing body of literature explores these particular urbanisation dynamics covering multiple scales from the everyday through to the broader urban and regional geographies of sub-Saharan Africa (Myers, 2003;Pieterse, 2008Pieterse, , 2010aPieterse, , 2010bSimone, 2004aSimone, , 2004bSimone, , 2010aSwilling, 2011).…”
Section: Speciþcity Of African Urbanisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infrastructure has tended to be understood through the dichotomy of formality and informality (Varley, 2013) yet new approaches are shifting our understandings to consider alternative forms of infra-structure that are heterogenous and hybrid, consisting of standard hardware, improvised technologies (Silver, 2014) and people them-selves (Simone, 2004a). This work draws attention to what Furlong (2014: 139) terms the, Ôcoexistence among sociotechnical systems, as opposed to the universality of a single dominant infrastructure networkÕ alongside the everyday practices that (re)make infra-structure space across various socio-material conÞgurations (McFarlane, 2009;Silver, 2014;Simone, 2004a). This growing body of literature explores these particular urbanisation dynamics covering multiple scales from the everyday through to the broader urban and regional geographies of sub-Saharan Africa (Myers, 2003;Pieterse, 2008Pieterse, , 2010aPieterse, , 2010bSimone, 2004aSimone, , 2004bSimone, , 2010aSwilling, 2011).…”
Section: Speciþcity Of African Urbanisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SDI's enumeration activities in particular represent a strategic attempt to render previously "invisible" uncounted citizens visible and lay bare the myths and prejudices that are used to justify their exclusion from substantive rights afforded to other citizens (Appadurai, 2002;McFarlane, 2009).…”
Section: From Quiet To Bold Encroachmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The array of labors involved in maintaining relations has frequently fallen outside the analytical gaze of studies of governance. The ongoing nature of these labors is widely acknowledged in ANT and AT 3 both of which emphasise how human and material actors are bound up with each other in actor-networks/assemblages and the ongoing work required to cohere and maintain them (e.g., McFarlane 2009;Müller 2015a). Yet analyses thus far have tended to be muted when it comes to specifying the processes, practices, and devices through which this work is achieved (though see Henry and Roche, 2013).…”
Section: From Governing Intent To Intervention: Configuring Urban Carmentioning
confidence: 99%