Translational simulation: not ‘where?’ but ‘why?’ A functional view of in situ simulation

Abstract

Healthcare simulation has been widely adopted for health professional education at all stages of training and practice and across cognitive, procedural, communication and teamwork domains. Recent enthusiasm for in situ simulation—delivered in the real clinical environment—cites improved transfer of knowledge and skills into real-world practice, as well as opportunities to identify latent safety threats and other workplace-specific issues.However, describing simulation type according to place may not be helpful. Instead, I propose the term translational simulation as a functional term for how simulation may be connected directly with health service priorities and patient outcomes, through interventional and diagnostic functions, independent of the location of the simulation activity.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s41077-017-0052-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Use of in situ simulation to evaluate the operational readiness of a high‐consequence infectious disease intensive care unit

“…This study suggests areas where resources need to be invested in order to ensure operational readiness of ICUs and other areas that may be called upon to manage patients with COVID-19. Translational simulation helps recognise and correct both active and latent threats in the local environment [14]. Communication and teamwork skills were identified which would help prevent safety breaches.…”

The use of simulation to prepare and improve responses to infectious disease outbreaks like COVID-19: practical tips and resources from Norway, Denmark, and the UK

“…Simulation has a huge potential to help managing the global COVID-19 crisis in 2020 and in potentially similar future pandemics. Simulation can rapidly facilitate hospital preparation and education of large numbers of healthcare professionals and students of various backgrounds and has proven its value in many settings [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. It can be utilised to scale-up workforce capacity through experiential learning.…”

Doing our work better, together: a relationship-based approach to defining the quality improvement agenda in trauma care

“…For the past five years, members from each of these groups have participated monthly in an in situ trauma respond simulation exercise including a case and debrief. The focus of these exercises is ‘translational’—including exploration of system strengths and weaknesses, and practising targeted interventions to improve 21. Prior to this project, independent groups (the trauma service and emergency medicine) had at various times identified trauma-related quality improvement goals, mainly related to care processes or systems .…”