2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00068-018-1003-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translational research: what is the value of experimental studies in comparison with clinical studies to help understand clinical problems?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is mainly due to heterogeneous TBI population in clinical trials, inappropriate TBI severity classification depending only on Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), variable outcome parameters in different trials, and the choice of experimental model. 3 The heterogeneity of TBI lies in the fact that the extent of contusions, edema, ischemia, raised intracranial pressure (ICP), hemorrhage, and secondary injury varies from person to person and is difficult to quantify just by the use of GCS.…”
Section: Acute Brain Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is mainly due to heterogeneous TBI population in clinical trials, inappropriate TBI severity classification depending only on Glasgow Coma Score (GCS), variable outcome parameters in different trials, and the choice of experimental model. 3 The heterogeneity of TBI lies in the fact that the extent of contusions, edema, ischemia, raised intracranial pressure (ICP), hemorrhage, and secondary injury varies from person to person and is difficult to quantify just by the use of GCS.…”
Section: Acute Brain Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%