2010
DOI: 10.2457/srs.40.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translational Regional Science, Input/Output Analysis and Community Engagement: New Perspectives for Closing the High Tech—Community Gap

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper builds on a series of previous works (Gibson et al. 2008, 2009, 2010), that addressed three key issues in planning a high tech/bio tech park.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This paper builds on a series of previous works (Gibson et al. 2008, 2009, 2010), that addressed three key issues in planning a high tech/bio tech park.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper builds on a series of previous works (Gibson et al 2008(Gibson et al , 2009(Gibson et al , 2010, that addressed three key issues in planning a high tech/bio tech park. First, the importance of identifying constituencies associated with such a project and understanding their interests and needs; second, the necessity to translate scientific and technical findings such as input-output (I/O) impacts into readily deliverable pieces to community leaders for local economic development, and third, the importance of establishing and sustaining a two-way relationship between research team and client during both the planning and implementation phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper extends previous contributions on Arizona (Gibson et al ; Lim et al ) by relying on the most recent IO regional data and using the true values of federal investments in science as a way to positively shock the local economy. County‐level federal investments in science, research and technology are transformed into expanded sales for the related industrial sectors.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Finally, while limited to one year of allocation, such data still allow our interregional input‐output analysis to highlight the spatial heterogeneity and the social externalities present in the distribution of the programme's return. An evidence of this type of social return appears in the IO study by Gibson et al () where the authors demonstrate that 30 per cent of the newly created jobs in high‐tech manufacturing sectors in 2006 in Pima county, where Tucson is located, were available for the group with ‘high school or less education’ while another 30 per cent were available for the group with ‘high school and some college or specialized training’. Another empirical IO study (Lim et al ) finds that the higher share of the direct jobs (46%) created in Arizona in 2009 was available for the group with ‘high school or less education’ and another 21 per cent was available for the group with ‘high school and some college or specialized training’.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%