2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.drudis.2016.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translational Medicine Guide transforms drug development processes: the recent Merck experience

Abstract: Merck is implementing a question-based Translational Medicine Guide (TxM Guide) beginning as early as lead optimization into its stage-gate drug development process. Initial experiences with the TxM Guide, which is embedded into an integrated development plan tailored to each development program, demonstrated opportunities to improve target understanding, dose setting (i.e., therapeutic index), and patient subpopulation selection with more robust and relevant early human-based evidence, and increased use of bi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, new models for a more effective and less costly drug development are needed. Some reported models focus on use of non-clinical or translational data to improve predictions of safety (Bowes et al, 2012) or efficacy (Dolgos et al, 2016). Others focus on target-centric approaches, particularly for new biological entities (Swinney and Anthony, 2011), more rapid paths to clinical proof-of-concept (Owens et al, 2015), or attempts to identify candidates for early termination, i.e., before the most expensive late-stage clinical development starts (Peck et al, 2015), or more systematic portfolio review to systematically challenge development candidates (Cook et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, new models for a more effective and less costly drug development are needed. Some reported models focus on use of non-clinical or translational data to improve predictions of safety (Bowes et al, 2012) or efficacy (Dolgos et al, 2016). Others focus on target-centric approaches, particularly for new biological entities (Swinney and Anthony, 2011), more rapid paths to clinical proof-of-concept (Owens et al, 2015), or attempts to identify candidates for early termination, i.e., before the most expensive late-stage clinical development starts (Peck et al, 2015), or more systematic portfolio review to systematically challenge development candidates (Cook et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our data suggest that the subset of high‐risk postmenopausal ER+ breast cancer patients characterized by PI3K/MAPK pathway activation via IGF‐1R may have more benefit from adjuvant tamoxifen to which linsitinib is added than from adjuvant tamoxifen alone. Naturally, the latter should be validated in an independent prospective randomized clinical trial …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Naturally, the latter should be validated in an independent prospective randomized clinical trial. 47 Currently, postmenopausal ER+ breast cancer patients generally receive tamoxifen in sequence with an AI, or 5 years of an AI as adjuvant endocrine therapy for at least 5 years. 3 Patients in our retrospective study received a maximum of 3 years of tamoxifen and no additional AI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complex multifactorial phenomena of interaction of human disease and response to treatment are highly under the influence of individuals genetically determined characteristics. If this issue of interaction of individuals genetics, diseases and reaction of treatment is resolved it will lead to costefficient approaches to therapeutic interventions ultimately will help in implementing "personalized medicine" [25,26].…”
Section: Chemoinformaticsmentioning
confidence: 99%