2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translational in vitro and in vivo PKPD modelling for apramycin against Gram-negative lung pathogens to facilitate prediction of human efficacious dose in pneumonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are in support of previous connotations that apramycin may represent a new generation of therapeutic aminoglycoside antibiotics that evades the widespread antimicrobial resistance that compromises the clinical utility of 4,6-disubstituted 2-deoxystreptamines such as gentamicin, tobramycin, netilmicin, amikacin, plazomicin, arbekacin, etimicin, and others. The apramycin MIC values reported in this study are well aligned with the apramycin PKPD targets modelled previously for once-daily intravenous infusion in humans [15,[17][18][19]. The present study complements these prior reports by expanding our knowledge to specifically include 470 blood culture isolates and an isolate panel of well-defined geographic origin.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results are in support of previous connotations that apramycin may represent a new generation of therapeutic aminoglycoside antibiotics that evades the widespread antimicrobial resistance that compromises the clinical utility of 4,6-disubstituted 2-deoxystreptamines such as gentamicin, tobramycin, netilmicin, amikacin, plazomicin, arbekacin, etimicin, and others. The apramycin MIC values reported in this study are well aligned with the apramycin PKPD targets modelled previously for once-daily intravenous infusion in humans [15,[17][18][19]. The present study complements these prior reports by expanding our knowledge to specifically include 470 blood culture isolates and an isolate panel of well-defined geographic origin.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Clinical resistant breakpoints for apramycin do not exist. The amikacin breakpoints were tentatively applied as interpretative cut-off values for apramycin in this study, based on previous reports indicating the in-vitro potency and PKPD of apramycin resembles that of amikacin in models using amikacin-susceptible strains [17][18][19]. For the aminoglycoside plazomicin, the FDA-Identified Susceptibility Test Interpretive Criteria (STIC) for Enterobacterales were applied.…”
Section: Ast Interpretationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In earlier stages of drug development, we made use of gentamicin PPK to predict the human efficacious dose since the PK of gentamicin and apramycin have been shown to be similar in preclinical studies. 9 , 16 , 17 This illustrates how model-informed drug development can be used to support drug development 41 before patient information is available. Defining the dose for Phase II based on a reduced eGFR also reduces the risk to suggest a dosing strategy that may lead to exposures above the studied range in Phase I and thereby increase the risk of toxicity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 9 , 16 This dose regimen was also recently predicted to be efficacious in clinical pneumonia caused by Gram-negative bacteria based on translational in vitro and in vivo PKPD modelling. 17 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reliability of the transferability of in vitro growth characteristics to human in vivo conditions to achieve a direct translation of the bacterial burden in patients is still a subject of research. One study, for example, analysed the same bacterial strain in vitro and in vivo and showed that model parameters may need to be adjusted to enable quantitative translation of the bacterial concentrations [ 40 ]. However, PKPD models allow for the drawing of inferences regarding which dosing regimen and shape of human concentration-time profile influence bacterial killing in the most favourable way.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%