1994
DOI: 10.1016/0168-1176(94)03998-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translational energy spectroscopy of single-electron capture by C2+ ions in He, Ne and Ar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

1995
1995
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…C + (1s 2 2s 2 2p) 2 P formation (peak M1) involves core conservation and the minor channel (peak M3) involving a core rearrangement process accounts for very little of the total C + yield. The previous TES measurements of oneelectron capture in C 2+ -Ne collisions by Lennon et al (1983) in this laboratory and by Lee et al (1994) using C 2+ beams with unknown metastable content are in good qualitative agreement with the present work. For Ne, the total one-electron capture cross section ratio σ ( 3 P)/σ ( 1 S) derived from the plots in figure 3(b) is 3.1 ± 0.2.…”
Section: One-electron Capture In Collisions Of Ground-state and Metas...supporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…C + (1s 2 2s 2 2p) 2 P formation (peak M1) involves core conservation and the minor channel (peak M3) involving a core rearrangement process accounts for very little of the total C + yield. The previous TES measurements of oneelectron capture in C 2+ -Ne collisions by Lennon et al (1983) in this laboratory and by Lee et al (1994) using C 2+ beams with unknown metastable content are in good qualitative agreement with the present work. For Ne, the total one-electron capture cross section ratio σ ( 3 P)/σ ( 1 S) derived from the plots in figure 3(b) is 3.1 ± 0.2.…”
Section: One-electron Capture In Collisions Of Ground-state and Metas...supporting
confidence: 92%
“…The minor peak M2 The present DTES measurements provide more detailed information on the one-electron capture process than previous TES measurements on the C 2+ -He system carried out with primary beams of unknown metastable content. If the C 2+ + He data of Lee et al (1994) are considered, even with their good energy resolution of 0.3 eV FWHM, their unspecified beam composition leads to confusion in their peak assignments. For example, they suggested that an observed peak at 2.8 eV in their energy change spectrum might be associated with the presence of primary-beam ions in a second 'metastable' C 2+ (2p 2 ) 3 P state although, according to Wiese et al (1966), this state has a lifetime of only 7.7 × 10 −10 s. In fact, the present energy change spectrum (figure 3(b)) for one-electron capture by a pure groundstate C 2+ beam in collisions with He, a process for which there are no exothermic product channels, shows that their unexplained peak at 2.8 eV can be identified with the background contaminant product channel G2.…”
Section: One-electron Capture In Collisions Of Ground-state and Metas...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The first TES study of one-electron capture by C 2+ ions in Ar was carried out in this laboratory (Lennon et al 1983) in the energy range 1-6 keV. There have been several other TES studies (Unterreiter et al 1991, Lee et al 1994 for C 2+ energies in the range 0.5-8 keV. All of these spectra, which are in good qualitative agreement with one another, contain a number of peaks which could be unambiguously attributed to either C 2+ (2s 2 ) 1 S ground-state ions or C 2+ (2s2p) 3 P metastable ions.…”
Section: Letter To the Editor L601mentioning
confidence: 99%