2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2019.01.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translation, validation and factor structure of the Tamil version of the Postpartum Bonding Questionnaire (PBQ-T)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study the sensitivity and specificity in the Chinese sample of the cut-off scores previously established by Brockington were calculated (Siu et al, 2010). The Tamil version also established cut-off points for the PBQ subscales, but their results are not comparable with the other versions because they modified the length of the instrument (Vengadavaradan et al, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study the sensitivity and specificity in the Chinese sample of the cut-off scores previously established by Brockington were calculated (Siu et al, 2010). The Tamil version also established cut-off points for the PBQ subscales, but their results are not comparable with the other versions because they modified the length of the instrument (Vengadavaradan et al, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The PBQ was translated and validated into multiple languages, including Chinese (Siu et al, 2010), Japanese (Ohashi et al, 2016;Suetsugu et al, 2015), Italian (Busonera et al, 2017), German (Reck et al, 2006) or Tamil (Vengadavaradan et al, 2019). Subsequent studies did not confirm the original factorial structure of the PBQ (Reck et al, 2006;Wittkowski et al, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have not yet had the evidence for optimal schedule of clinical assessments for bonding disorders. The results from the systematic researches introduced in Background section of this paper, in which the interview conducted ranged from 3 days to 15 months after birth depends on research design,1 5 10–15 didn’t clarify the optimal time point of the interview. According to the general instruction of the Stafford Interview published as the latest version, the whole interview can be conducted in the community or in the clinical setting anytime up to 1 year after childbirth 4…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…According to the systematic researches by using the Stafford Interview and bonding questionnaires,1 5 10–15 they found that from 10% to 30% of mothers with psychiatric symptoms referred to the specialised hospital at perinatal period had Emotional rejection. Brockington estimated from the result of his own research that Emotional rejection was found about 1% from the study of Birmingham and Christchurch.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total score ranges from 0 to 30, the higher the score, the greater the risk of PPD. The EPDS has been translated and validated in many countries, with various cut-off points during the postnatal period, such as Turkey (12.5) (27), Malta (11.5) (28), Spain (10.5) (29), and India (8.5) (30). In 1998, Lee et al translated and validated the Chinese version of the EPDS and identified 9/10 as the optimal cut-off for the study population.…”
Section: Screening For Postpartum Depressionmentioning
confidence: 99%