1994
DOI: 10.1128/jb.176.5.1242-1250.1994
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translation through an uncDC mRNA secondary structure governs the level of uncC expression in Escherichia coli

Abstract: Escherichia coli expresses the and E subunits of F1F0-ATP synthase at relative levels consistent with the 3:1 (,B/£) stoichiometry in the holoenzyme. The mechanism of translational control of expression of the uncC gene (£ subunit) relative to the immediately 5' uncD gene (,1 subunit) was examined. Previous expression studies and a computer analysis suggested the presence of an RNA secondary structure including the 3' end of uncD, the uncDC intergenic region, and the uncC Shine-Dalgarno sequence (S. D. Dunn an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This activation Involves the destabilization of an inhibitory secondary structure in the mRNA (Mayford and Weisblum, 1985} which allows a second ribosome to initiate at the downstream Shine-Dalgarno sequence. In some cases the ribosome-binding site {RBS) of the translationally regulated gene is actually sequestered within the inhibitory secondary structure (Dallman and Dunn, 1994). However, in other situations (as appears to be the case for pilK) the RBS is not sequestered in a RNAiRNA duplex but is located close enough to the stem of the secondary structure to inhibit ribosomal access (Blumer et aL, 1987).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This activation Involves the destabilization of an inhibitory secondary structure in the mRNA (Mayford and Weisblum, 1985} which allows a second ribosome to initiate at the downstream Shine-Dalgarno sequence. In some cases the ribosome-binding site {RBS) of the translationally regulated gene is actually sequestered within the inhibitory secondary structure (Dallman and Dunn, 1994). However, in other situations (as appears to be the case for pilK) the RBS is not sequestered in a RNAiRNA duplex but is located close enough to the stem of the secondary structure to inhibit ribosomal access (Blumer et aL, 1987).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficiency of coupling or the degree to which the downstream gene (i.e., pilK) is expressed, therefore, depends upon the length of time for which the 'activated' sequences remain available for translation initiation (Blumer et al. 1987;Dallman and Dunn, 1994). In theory, it should be possible to estimate the duration of p/7K translation initiation region availability and the approximate frequency with which pilK is translated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By this mechanism, ribosomes translating the proximal gene would melt the inhibitory mRNA secondary structure, thus allowing new ribosomes to gain access from solution to the RBS of the distal gene. Facilitated binding has been suggested for other translationally coupled genes (Lesage et al ., 1992; Dallmann and Dunn, 1994), and it may be the only mechanism to explain the synthesis of the distal gene product in greater amounts than the proximal one, as is observed in some coupled systems (Yates and Nomura, 1981; Gerstel and McCarthy, 1989). However, unambiguous direct evidence regarding the involvement of the same or different ribosomes in the translation of a pair of translationally coupled genes has not yet been provided.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of an inverted repeat between tbpA and tbpB is unique to this gene cluster; neither the genes that encode the components of the lactoferrin receptor (lbpBA) nor those that encode the hemoglobin receptor (hpuAB) are separated by similar sequence or spacing (4,5,35,36,46). The stoichiometry of multisubunit complexes, such as the photosynthesis reaction center (33) and the bacterial ATPase (16), are influenced by secondary structures located in the polycistronic operons from which they are encoded. Furthermore, the stem-loop structures in these systems influence the relative amounts of the subunit transcripts and thereby affect the final stoichiometry of the complex.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%