2017
DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1353648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translation of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire into Swedish, and validity and reliability in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Abstract: The Leicester Cough Questionnaire in Swedish is a valid and reliable instrument to measure health-related quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and can be used in clinical settings. Implications for Rehabilitation The Leicester Cough Questionnaire, has been translated into Swedish, following an established forward-backward procedure, including cross-cultural adaptation The Swedish version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire, is a valid, reliable instrument for measuring health… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The internal consistency of the German LCQ was good to excellent, with Cronbach’s Alphas between 0.87 to 0.94 for the three subscales. The high internal consistency of the German LCQ, as well as the moderate concurrent validity compared to general health or respiratory-specific HRQL questionnaires, is in line with published data, after translation into several other languages[ 15 , 16 , 19 , 22 , 55 ] as well as in the original LCQ[ 11 ]. In this regard it is astonishing that the Physical Component Summary Score (PCS) of the SF-36 showed a quite high correlation with the LCQ, while the Mental Component Summary Score (MCS) does not.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The internal consistency of the German LCQ was good to excellent, with Cronbach’s Alphas between 0.87 to 0.94 for the three subscales. The high internal consistency of the German LCQ, as well as the moderate concurrent validity compared to general health or respiratory-specific HRQL questionnaires, is in line with published data, after translation into several other languages[ 15 , 16 , 19 , 22 , 55 ] as well as in the original LCQ[ 11 ]. In this regard it is astonishing that the Physical Component Summary Score (PCS) of the SF-36 showed a quite high correlation with the LCQ, while the Mental Component Summary Score (MCS) does not.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Concurent validity proved to be strong when LCQ scores were compared to the severity of the most frequent symptoms of sarcoidosis patients -dyspnea and fatigue, as well as to their general healt as assessd by the 15D questionnaire. In other publish studies [12,13,16,19,41] correlations between LCQ scores and diff erent PROs (mainly genetic QoL instruments) were mostly moderate as it was also the case with the original LCQ validation [6].…”
Section: Lcq -Physicalmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Fidelity of physical tests was ensured since the tests were also conducted by the same specialized physiotherapist, where all parts were instructed in accordance with the test protocol. The following tests and questionnaires were used to investigate possible responses on exercise from the home exercise training module: the 6-min walking test (physical capacity), 22,23 the sit-tostand test (muscle strength lower extremity), 24,25 1 repetition maximum for elbow flexion (muscle strength upper extremity) and multiple repetitions maximum for elbow flexion (muscle endurance upper extremity), 26 accelerometry (physical activity level), 27 COPD Assessment Test, 19,28 Leicester Cough Questionnaire in Swedish, 29,30 the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale 31 and the CSI Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale. 32…”
Section: Home-based Exercise Trainingmentioning
confidence: 99%