Translation of P = kT into a pictorial external representation by high school seniors

Abstract

This paper describes the results achieved by high school seniors on an item which involves translation of the equationP=kTinto a corresponding pictorial external representation. The majority of students (the classes of 2011, 2012 and 2013) did not give the correct answer to the multiple choice part of the translation item. They chose pictorial representations of the other gas laws (P=k/V, orV=kT) instead. Failure to choose the correct answer was surprising considering that the symbol for volume was absent which should have been the key clue. Through the analysis of students' explanations (the classes of 2011 and 2012) and interviews (the class of 2013) we considered the reasoning applied by students who chose the correct answer or distractors for the multiple choice part of the item. Among the students who answered correctly there were explanations which contained misconceptions. Several factors that lead to the unsuccessful translation between external representations have been discovered. Students interpreted the change in one quantity based on the notation for the change in another one because of deep rooted cognitive schemas about changing two quantities (volume and pressure, pressure and temperature, temperature and volume), without consideration that for such changes to be valid for gases all three quantities need to be considered for a certain amount of substance. Those cognitive schemas interfered with mathematical reasoning,i.e.students possessed limited understanding of the equations.

Teaching about thermal expansion: investigating the effectiveness of a cognitive bridging approach

“…Consequently, an increase/decrease of the air-filled space between concentric discs is for them more intuitively acceptable if the coefficients of expansion of the discs differ. Difficulties related to failing to take into account the 'third variable' are well known in physics education research (Leinonen, Asikainen, and Hirvonen 2013;Matijašević, Korolija, and Mandić 2016) and our finding is in line with results of that research. Issues with taking into account the 'third variable' (i.e.…”

“…Many students believed that it is sufficient to think only about two variables (temperature increase and length increase), disregarding the importance of the third variable (initial length). The students' tendency to disregard the importance of the 'third variable' has been already identified in earlier research on other physics topics (Leinonen, Asikainen, and Hirvonen 2013;Matijašević, Korolija, and Mandić 2016).…”

Patterns of Metacognitive Skills and External Representation of Students in Chemistry Problem Solving

“…Even findings in chemistry learning are specifically stated that external representations and visual thinking in learning basic, organic, and biochemical chemistry cause a person to be able to make ideas, organize, and synthesize knowledge (Cox & Jones, 2011). This cognitive scheme can disturb mathematical reasoning in solving chemical-physical problems if students have a limited understanding of the equation (Matijašević et al, 2016). Therefore, someone who does problem-solving by involving metacognitive skills and external representations and has an understanding of mathematical equations will increase the retention of related knowledge, be able to connect new knowledge with previous knowledge, make ideas, organize and even synthesize knowledge.…”

“…(Cook, 2006) found representations in learning science not only improves the ability of problem-solving but can also increase the retention of related knowledge and facilitate the integration of new knowledge with prior knowledge. More specifically, the findings of (Cox & Jones, 2011;Matijašević et al, 2016) focus on the types of external representations in learning basic, organic, and biochemical chemistry. They found that external representations and visual thinking have the potential to make ideas and act.…”

Modeling Teaching in Study of Galvanic Cells: Upper-Secondary School Context

“…Science teaching should not only enable students to acquire a large amount of organized knowledge in a specific field but also, more importantly, equip students with the ability to solve problems in that field (Salta & Tzougraki, 2011;Yuriev et al, 2017). However, in the chemistry classroom, teachers still face the dilemma that students only remember factual knowledge and have a knowledge base, but they do not use the knowledge they have learned to solve problems (Bodner, 2004;Matijašević et al, 2016;Overton & Potter, 2011).…”