Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Properties of the Polish Version of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)

Glinkowski, Wojciech; Żukowska, Agnieszka; Dymitrowicz, Małgorzata; Wołyniec, Emilia; Glinkowska, Bożena; Kozioł-Kaczorek, Dorota

doi:10.3390/medicina55100614

Cited by 9 publications

(7 citation statements)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Like many other assessment scales that are translated from English and adapted into the national language [21][22][23][24][25], originally in English and Swedish, up to the present UEFMA has been translated and used in Italy, Japan, The Netherlands and the USA [26] and has been validated in its translated forms for Danish and Spanish (Colombian) [27,28].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Equal Opportunities for Stroke Survivors’ Rehabilitation: A Study on the Validity of the Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale Translated and Adapted into Romanian

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and objectives: The Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment (UEFMA) is one of the most recommended and used methods of clinical evaluation not only for post-stroke motor function disability conditions but also for physiotherapy goal-setting. Up to the present, an official Romanian version has not been officially available. This study aims to carry out a translation, adaptation, and validation of UEFMA in Romanian, thus giving both patients and medical practitioners the equal opportunity of benefiting from its proficiency. Material and methods: The English version of the motor component of UEFMA was back and forth translated in the assent of best practice translation guidelines. The research was performed on a group of 64 post-stroke in-patients regarding psychometric properties for content validation and an exploratory and confirmatory factorial analysis was performed using the Bayesian model. To assess internal consistency and test–retest reliability, we used the Cronbach Alpha index and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). We used Pearson correlation with the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) and Modified Rankin Scale (MRS) to determine concurrent validation. Standardized response mean (SRM) was applied to determine the responsiveness of the instrument used. Results: After performing the exploratory factor analysis, a single factor was extracted, with an Eigenvalue of 19.363, which explained 64.543% of the variation. The model was confirmed by Bayesian exploration, with Root Mean Square Residual (RMR) 0.051, Goodness-of-fit Index (GFI) 0.980, Normed-Fit Index (NFI) 0.978 and Relative Fit Index (RFI) 0.977. The Cronbach Alpha value was 0.981, the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) index for average measures was 0.992, the Pearson correlation with FIM 0.789, and MRS −0.787, while the SRM was 1.117. Conclusions: The Romanian version of the UEFMA scale is a reliable, responsive and valid tool which can be used as a standardized assessment in post-stroke patients across Romania.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Equal Opportunities for Stroke Survivors’ Rehabilitation: A Study on the Validity of the Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale Translated and Adapted into Romanian

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Currently, there are 19 languages available. Also a validated cross-cultural adapted Polish version is available [26].…”

Section: Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scorementioning

confidence: 99%

An update on joint-specific outcome measures in total hip replacement

Pulik¹,

Romaniuk²,

Jaśkiewicz³

et al. 2020

Reumatologia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This is the latest review of joint-specific tools used to evaluate patients undergoing total hip replacement (THR) surgery, which is an effective treatment for end-stage osteoarthritis. Due to the large number and multitude of scales and their variants used, a critical assessment of the available tools is necessary. In the article, we briefly describe six different clinical tools: the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, the Harris Hip Score, the Oxford Hip Score, the Mayo Hip Score, and the Rheumatoid and Arthritis Outcome Score. We present the advantages and constraints of the different outcome measures, providing a helpful resource of information for clinical trials and for everyday routine evaluation.

show abstract

“…The first group showed greater potential to better differentiate groups by clinically salient symptoms and responsiveness to changes in the condition of the subjects [ 13 ]. Researchers and clinicians in Poland can use the available Polish language versions of the questionnaires to assess the health status of people with OA—the Western Ontario and Macmaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) [ 14 , 15 ], the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) [ 16 ], the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) [ 17 ], and the Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADLS) [ 18 ]. The generic PROMs available in the Polish version include the SF-36 Health Survey 2.0 (SF-36 v.2.0), which have been widely used in the assessment of quality of life [ 19 , 20 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Psychometric properties of the Polish version of the 36-item WHODAS 2.0 in patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose To examine psychometric properties of the Polish version of the 36-item WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) in the population with hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA). Methods This was a longitudinal study with repeated measures during retest examinations. Subjects from a Polish Specialist Hospital (age = 68.3 ± 9.2years, 71% female, 44.2% knee OA, 55.8% hip OA) were tested three times. They completed the Polish version of the 36-item WHODAS 2.0, the SF-36 Health Survey 2.0, the Western Ontario and Macmaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index 3.1, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the Numerical Rating Scale. Results The 36-item WHODAS 2.0—Polish version demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha for total = 0.94), and test–retest reliability (Total ICC2,1 = 0.98). High construct validity was found as 12 out of 15 a priori hypotheses (80%) were confirmed. Most domains and Total Scores in the 36-item WHODAS 2.0 (Total ES = − 0.62, SMR = − 1.09) showed a moderate degree of responsiveness. Minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the Total WHODAS 2.0 was 3.29 in patients undergoing rehabilitation for knee or hip OA. Conclusions The Polish version of the 36-item WHODAS 2.0 assesses disability according to ICF in a reliable, valid and responsive way. Therefore, it provides considerable support in clinical practice and national and international scientific research of patients with hip or knee OA.

show abstract

Translation, Cross-Cultural Adaptation, and Psychometric Properties of the Polish Version of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS)

Cited by 9 publications

References 45 publications

Equal Opportunities for Stroke Survivors’ Rehabilitation: A Study on the Validity of the Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale Translated and Adapted into Romanian

Equal Opportunities for Stroke Survivors’ Rehabilitation: A Study on the Validity of the Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale Translated and Adapted into Romanian

An update on joint-specific outcome measures in total hip replacement

Psychometric properties of the Polish version of the 36-item WHODAS 2.0 in patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About