Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and factor analysis of the Persian version of ankle instability instrument

Mohamadi, Somayeh; Ebrahimi, Ismail; Dadgoo, Mehdi; Salavati, Mahyar; Saeedi, Ahmad; Valiollahi, Bijan

doi:10.14196/mjiri.32.79

Cited by 5 publications

(8 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Since the value is not too close to 1, we can conclude that the items are not too redundant and therefore do not have a "double-use" effect. This analysis is consistent with that made in the Persian version (0,87) [23] and in the initial version where the Cronbach's alpha coefficient is 0.89 [13]. Regarding the convergent and divergent validity, we can conclude that 75% of the observations made confirm our initial hypotheses.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

“…This value indicates a very good test-retest reliability of the AII-F. At unchanged health status, the AII-F score also remains unchanged. Moreover, this result is close to that obtained in the Persian version (0.93) [23] and in the original validation article AII (0,95) [13]. Internal consistency was evaluated and had an alpha of 0.861, indicating good internal consistency.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 87%

“…Knowing that chronic instability represents between 20% and 40% of subjects who have had a sprained ankle, we could thus spread the use of a new evaluation tool of functional instability in the Belgian Francophone population. Our statistical analyses, which have been confronted with those observed in the initial validation article of the AII [13] and the Persian version [23] were strongly similar. This demonstrates the good validity and reliability of the AII-F.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 66%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The “Ankle Instability Instrument”: Cross-cultural adaptation and validation in French

Locquet

Benhotman

Bornheim

et al. 2021

Foot and Ankle Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 87%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 66%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The “Ankle Instability Instrument”: Cross-cultural adaptation and validation in French

Locquet

Benhotman

Bornheim

et al. 2021

Foot and Ankle Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Additionally, reliability of the IdFAI has been established across several adult age groups. 166 Likewise, the AII has been translated into Chinese, 273 French, 286 and Persian, 316 with evidence to support their use. One systematic review questioned the use of validated instruments translated and cross-culturally adapted for Brazilian Portuguese after critical analysis of their psychometric properties.…”

Section: IIImentioning

confidence: 99%

Ankle Stability and Movement Coordination Impairments: Lateral Ankle Ligament Sprains Revision 2021

Martin¹,

Davenport²,

Fraser³

et al. 2021

Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

B Clinicians should include patient age, body mass index, pain coping strategies, report of instability, history of previous sprain, ability to bear weight, pain with weight bearing, ankle dorsiflexion range of motion (ROM), medial jointline tenderness, balance, and ability to jump and land (as safely tolerated) in their initial assessment, because of their role in influencing the clinical course and estimation of time to accomplish the goals of an individual with an acute lateral ankle sprain (LAS). CLINICAL COURSE -CHRONIC ANKLE INSTABILITYC Clinicians may include previous treatment, number of sprains, pain level, and self-report of function in their evaluation, as well as an assessment of the sensorimotor movement systems of the foot, ankle, knee, and hip during dynamic postural control and functional movements, because of their role in influencing the clinical course and estimation of time to accomplish the goals of an individual with chronic ankle instability (CAI). DIAGNOSIS/CLASSIFICATION -ACUTE LATERAL ANKLE SPRAINB Clinicians should use special tests, including the reverse anterolateral drawer test and anterolateral talar palpation in addition to the traditional anterior drawer test, and a thorough history and physical examination to aid in the diagnosis of a LAS. DIAGNOSIS/CLASSIFICATION -CHRONIC ANKLE INSTABILITYB When determining whether an individual has CAI, clinicians should use a reliable and valid discriminative instrument, such as the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool or the Identification of Functional Ankle Instability, as well as a battery of functional performance tests that have established validity to differentiate between healthy controls and individuals with CAI. EXAMINATION -OUTCOME MEASURESA Clinicians should use validated patient-reported outcome measures, such as the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function and pain interference scales, the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure, and the Lower Extremity Functional Scale, as part of a standard clinical examination. Clinicians should utilize these before and 1 or more times after the application of interventions intended to alleviate the impairments of body function and structure, activity limitations, and participation restrictions associated with an acute LAS or CAI.C Clinicians may use the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire in the acute and postacute periods after a LAS to assess effective coping strategies for pain, and the 11-item Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia and the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire to assess fear of movement and reinjury and fear-avoidance beliefs in those with CAI. EXAMINATION -PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENT MEASURESA Clinicians should assess and document ankle swelling, ROM, talar translation, talar inversion, and single-leg balance in patients with an acute LAS, postacute LAS, or CAI at baseline and 2 or more times over an episode of care. Clinicians should specifically include measures of dorsiflexion, using the weight-bearing lunge test, static single-limb balance on a firm surface with eyes...

show abstract

“…The Hebrew AII’s internal consistency (α=0.86) was similar to the original English version (α=0.89, [ 4 ]), as well as to the French and Persian translations (α=0.86–0.87, [ 21 , 22 ]). The ROC analysis yielded an optimal cut-off score of 5, which is identical to the cut-off score reported by Locquet et al in the French translation of the AII [ 21 ] and the International Ankle Consortium recommendations for patient selection [ 3 ].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 64%

Reliability and Validity of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Ankle Instability in Hebrew

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The International Ankle Consortium has recommended several instruments for assessing and diagnosing chronic ankle instability. These include the Ankle Instability Instrument (AII), Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT), Identification of Functional Ankle Instability (IdFAI), and Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and assess the reliability, validity, discriminative power, and classification agreement of the Hebrew online versions of the AII, CAIT, IdFAI, and FAAM. Material/Methods After translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the questionnaires, we recruited 87 participants with self-reported ankle disorders to evaluate the psychometric properties of the questionnaires. To evaluate each questionnaire’s discriminative power, we recruited 75 healthy participants. Reliability was assessed by calculating internal consistency (Cronbach’s alphas) and test-retest intraclass correlation coefficients. Convergent and divergent validity were assessed by Spearman’s correlation between each instrument and the Short-Form-12 (SF-12) score for physical and mental components, respectively. Results All instruments had acceptable internal consistency (α>0.7) and good test-retest reliability (ICC 2,1 >0.8), except for the IdFAI (ICC 2,1 =0.73). All instruments had moderate convergent validity (ρ>0.4 with SF-12 physical component) except for AII (ρ=0.36). No instrument was correlated with the SF-12 mental component score (good divergent validity, ρ<0.3). All instruments had excellent discriminative power (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve >0.9). Strong correlations were found between all instruments. Conclusions The Hebrew online versions of the AII, CAIT, IdFAI, and FAAM are valid, consistent, and reliable and may be used in research or clinical settings.

show abstract

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and factor analysis of the Persian version of ankle instability instrument

Cited by 5 publications

References 20 publications

The “Ankle Instability Instrument”: Cross-cultural adaptation and validation in French

The “Ankle Instability Instrument”: Cross-cultural adaptation and validation in French

Ankle Stability and Movement Coordination Impairments: Lateral Ankle Ligament Sprains Revision 2021

Reliability and Validity of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Ankle Instability in Hebrew

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About