2021
DOI: 10.1111/cob.12503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translation and validation of the Greek version of the Modified Weight Bias Internalization Scale in an adult population

Abstract: Weight bias internalization (WBI) has been identified as a global public health concern, which is associated with significant psychological and physical consequences. Despite increased interest in WBI worldwide, cross-cultural research is limited by the lack of availability of validated measures. The aim of the current study was therefore to translate into Greek and validate the Modified Weight Bias Internalization Scale (WBIS-M), the most widely used instrument in the measurement of WBI. An online convenience… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher scores imply lower internalized bias towards body weight. The Greek version of the WBIS‐M upheld its one‐factor structure and demonstrated excellent internal consistency (α = .91 ‐ .93 for all scales) and test–retest reliability ( r = .84) 31 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Higher scores imply lower internalized bias towards body weight. The Greek version of the WBIS‐M upheld its one‐factor structure and demonstrated excellent internal consistency (α = .91 ‐ .93 for all scales) and test–retest reliability ( r = .84) 31 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Higher scores imply lower internalized bias towards body weight. The Greek version of the WBIS-M upheld its one-factor structure and demonstrated excellent internal consistency (α = .91 -.93 for all scales) and test-retest reliability (r = .84) 31. Dysfunctional eating habitsThe Greek version of the Drive for Thinness subscale from the Eating Disorders Inventory-3 (EDI-3)32 was used to assess dysfunctional eating habits.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In adult and youth samples, internalized weight stigma was quantified by 10 different iterations of the WBIS: the original 11-item scale [( 6 ); n = 18], the WBIS modified for all body weights with 11 items [WBIS-M; ( 1 ); n = 10], a 10-item version [( 36 ); n = 4], a modified 10-item version ( n = 1), the 19-item WBIS [( 6 ); n = 2], a modified 9-item Italian version [( 37 ); n = 1], a modified 10-item German version (34; n = 1), a modified Greek version ( 38 ), a modified Spanish version (( 39 ); n = 1), and the WBIS for children ( n = 2). The remaining adult studies quantified internalized weight stigma through administration of the Weight Self Stigma Questionnaire [( 40 ); n = 6] and the self-stigma sub-scale of the Acceptance and Action for Weight Questionnaire [AAQ-W; ( 41 ); n = 1].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported correlations between BSQ scores and WBIS scores [0.54-0.77; ( 6 , 75 , 76 )], and EDI-BD and WBIS scores [0.69-0.72; ( 68 , 77 )] were of similar strengths. The other measures used in community and college samples were MSBRQ subscales correlated with various iterations of the WBIS [0.40-0.80; ( 12 , 36 , 38 , 59 , 61 , 69 , 70 )], the Male Body Attitudes Scale and 11-item WBIS-M [0.73; ( 60 )], the body dissatisfaction subscale of the EPSI and the WBIS-M [0.74-0.76; ( 79 )] and the Body Image States Scale correlated with the 11-item WBIS-M [0.27; ( 80 )]. All but four of the published community or college-based studies we identified reported correlations exceeding a large effect size, some approaching a perfect linear relationship ( 82 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, given the consistent evidence that individuals with normal-weight (those with adequate body mass index (18.5–24.9 kg/m 2 ) also experience WBI [ 23 ], a modified version of the WBIS (The WBIS-M; [ 24 ]) was developed to adapt the scale for use across various body weight statuses. The WBIS-M has been translated and adapted to various cultures and languages over the recent years, including Spanish [ 25 ], Greek [ 26 ], Chinese [ 27 ], and Turkish [ 28 ]. More recently, a shortened 3-item version of the WBIS-M (i.e., WBIS-3) has been validated in the German general population [ 29 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%