Translation and validation of the Breast-feeding Self-efficacy Scale into Turkish

Ekşioğlu, Aysun; Çeber, Esin

doi:10.1016/j.midw.2010.10.009

Cited by 23 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Level of education did not significantly influence breastfeeding self-efficacy scores (Eksioglu & Ceber, 2011). This finding is in contrast to Alus Tokat, Okumus and Dennis (2010) who found education level to be significantly correlated with BSES-SF scores both in the prenatal period (p=0.002) as well as in the postnatal period (p=0.01) among a sample of Turkish women.…”

Section: North American Populationscontrasting

confidence: 74%

“…In Turkey, BSES scores were found to be significantly higher among women exclusively breastfeeding at 1 week post-partum (p=<0.01), 4 weeks post-partum (p=<0.01) and 8 weeks post-partum (p=<0.05) (Eksioglu & Ceber, 2011). Women who initiated the first breastfeed sooner had higher breastfeeding self-efficacy at 1 week (p=<0.05) and 4 weeks post-partum (p=<0.05) compared to women who delayed the first breastfeed, although this did not remain statistically significant at 8 weeks post-partum.…”

Section: North American Populationsmentioning

confidence: 94%

“…The impact of maternal education on breastfeeding self-efficacy is inconsistent across the literature. While some studies did not find any significant association between maternal education status and breastfeeding self-efficacy (Eksioglu & Ceber, 2011;Zubaran & Foresti, 2011;Alus Tokat et al, 2010;Otsuka et al, 2008;Blyth, 2002), other studies found a link between maternal education status and breastfeeding self-efficacy (Lemon Uchoa et al, 2014;Oria et al, 2009).…”

Section: Highest Education Level Attainedmentioning

confidence: 98%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Investigating Predictors of Prenatal Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background While breastfeeding is considered the optimal method of infant feeding, Canadian breastfeeding rates remain below the World Health Organization recommendations. Breastfeeding self-efficacy is known to positively influence breastfeeding outcomes. While previous research has identified predictors of breastfeeding self-efficacy in the immediate postpartum, this study identified predictors of breastfeeding self-efficacy in the prenatal period. Research aim: The aim of this study was to identify predictors of breastfeeding self-efficacy in the prenatal period among both primiparous and multiparous women. Methods A sample of 401 Canadian pregnant women in their third trimester completed an online survey. Stepwise multiple linear regression identified predictors of breastfeeding self-efficacy. Results The following variables explained 41.2% of the variance in breastfeeding self-efficacy among the entire sample: feeling prepared for labor and birth, number of children, breastfeeding knowledge, anxiety, length of plan to exclusively breastfeed, income, plan to exclusively breastfeed, and type of health-care provider. Among primiparous women, the following variables explained 31.6% of the variance in breastfeeding self-efficacy: feeling prepared for labor and birth, income, anxiety, length of plan to exclusively breastfeed, education, and marital status. Among the multiparous women, the following variables explained 33.6% of the variance in breastfeeding self-efficacy: anxiety, length of prior exclusive breastfeeding experience, breastfeeding knowledge, and plan to exclusively breastfeed. Conclusion Through the identification of predictors of breastfeeding self-efficacy in the prenatal period, health-care providers can strategically target women at risk of low breastfeeding self-efficacy and intervene early to promote breastfeeding.

show abstract

Section: North American Populationscontrasting

confidence: 74%

Section: North American Populationsmentioning

confidence: 94%

Section: Highest Education Level Attainedmentioning

confidence: 98%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Investigating Predictors of Prenatal Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Category 2 -Assessment of the perception and behaviour of nursing women Breastfeeding Personal Efficacy Beliefs Inventory (BPEBI)/ Cleveland and McCrone, 2005 (21) Measure the confidence of women regarding their ability to manage their thoughts, emotions, motivation, action and environment to successfully breastfeed for one year. Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale (BSES)/ Dennis and Faux, 1999 (22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28) Assess maternal behaviour in relation to breastfeeding from the perspective of self-efficacy. Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale -Short Form (BSES-SF)/Dennis, 2003 (29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46) H & H Lactation Scale (HHLS)/Hill and Humenick, 1996 (47)(48) Measure maternal perception of insufficient milk production.…”

Section: Presentation Of Conclusionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…USA/English (13)(14)(15)(16)(17) Yes (13)(14)(15)17) /No (16) Yes (13)(14)(15)17) /No (16) Turkey/Turkish (18) Yes (18) Yes (18) BAS USA/English (19) , Spanish (20) Yes (19)(20) No (19)(20) Category 2 -Assessment of the perception and behaviour of nursing women BPEBI USA/English (21) Yes (21) No (21) BSES Canada/English (22) Yes (22) No (22) China/Chinese (23) Yes (23) Yes (23) Porto Rico/Spanish (24) Yes (24) Yes (24) Australia/English (25) Yes (25) Yes (25) Brazil/Portuguese (26)(27) Yes (26)(27) Yes (26)(27) Turkey/Turkish (28) Yes (28) Yes (28) BSES-SF Canada/English …”

Section: Baptmentioning

confidence: 99%

Instrumentos de avaliação do aleitamento materno e seu uso na prática clínica

Sartorio

Coca

Marcacine

et al. 2017

Rev. Gaúcha Enferm.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Results:We identifi ed 19 assessment tools, of which 12 were validated and fi ve were cross-culturally adapted. In terms of adaptation, the tools were used to assess the risk of early weaning (BAPT) and the perception/behaviour of mothers during nursing (BSES-SF and IIFAS). Conclusions:The identifi cation of the available instruments and their indications for breastfeeding assessments can help health workers choose the ideal instrument, and qualify maternal and child care. Keywords: Breast feeding. Evolution. Postpartum period. RESUMOObjetivos: Identifi car instrumentos de avaliação da amamentação e sua aplicação na prática clínica, validação e adaptação transcultural. Método: Revisão integrativa, realizada em seis bases de dados e em uma biblioteca eletrônica, entre agosto/2014-dezembro/2015, sem limitação temporal. Resultados: Foram identifi cados 19 instrumentos de avaliação do AM. Destes, 12 foram validados e cinco foram adaptados transculturalmente. Quanto à aplicação, destacam-se seu uso para a avaliação do risco de desmame (BAPT) e a percepção/comportamento da mulher em amamentar (BSES-SF e IIFAS). Conclusão: A identifi cação dos instrumentos disponíveis e de suas indicações para a avaliação do AM pode auxiliar profi ssionais na escolha pelo instrumento a ser utilizado, qualifi cando a assistência materno-infantil. Palavras-chave: Aleitamento materno. Avaliação. Período pós-parto. RESUMEN Objetivo:Identifi car los instrumentos de evaluación de amamantamiento, la aplicación en la práctica clínica, validación y adaptación cultural. Método: Revisión integradora, realizado en seis bases de datos y una biblioteca electrónica a partir de agosto/2014 a diciembre/2015 sin limitación temporal. Resultados: Identifi cado 19 instrumentos de evaluación y, de estos, 12 fueron validados y cinco fueron adaptados culturalmente. La aplicación destaca su uso para evaluar el riesgo de destete (BAPT) y la percepción/comportamiento de las mujeres en enfermería (BSES-SF y IIFAS). Conclusiones: La identifi cación de los instrumentos disponibles y sus indicaciones para la evaluación de la lactancia materna puede ayudar a los profesionales en la elección del instrumento que se utiliza, califi cativo del cuidado materno-infantil. Palabras clave: Lactancia materna. Evaluación. Periodo posparto.

show abstract

Readiness for Weaning Scale: Development and psychometric measurement study

Türkmen,

Ekşioğlu,

Tuna Oran

et al. 2023

Infant and Child Development

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study was carried out to develop a measurement tool to determine the readiness of mothers and babies for weaning. At the first stage of the study, a draft of the Readiness for Weaning Scale (RWS) was created. In the second stage, this draft was presented to the opinions of experts (CVI:0.85), and in the third stage, the validity and reliability of RWS were tested by collecting data from the participants (n = 265). Factor analysis was performed to determine the construct validity of RWS. As a result of the exploratory factor analysis, the KMO statistic was found to be 0.802. In the factor analysis, four factors were determined, and these factors explained 60.023% of the total variance as a result of the analysis performed with the varimax vertical rotation technique (Weaning intention, Baby's readiness, Weaning technique, Mother's readiness). The internal consistency coefficient of the scale was found to indicate a quite high level of reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.793).

show abstract

Translation and validation of the Breast-feeding Self-efficacy Scale into Turkish

Cited by 23 publications

References 21 publications

Investigating Predictors of Prenatal Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy

Investigating Predictors of Prenatal Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy

Instrumentos de avaliação do aleitamento materno e seu uso na prática clínica

Readiness for Weaning Scale: Development and psychometric measurement study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About