2016
DOI: 10.3109/17483107.2016.1161088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translation and validation of the assistive technology device predisposition assessment in Greek in order to assess satisfaction with use of the selected assistive device

Abstract: This is the first study, at least to the knowledge of the authors, which focuses merely on measuring the satisfaction of the users from the used assistive device, while exploring the Assistive Technology Device Predisposition Assessment - Device Form in such depth. According to the results, it is a stable, valid and reliable instrument and applicable to the Greek population. Thus, it can be used to measure the satisfaction of patients with assistive devices. Implications for Rehabilitation The paper explores t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We should therefore look into the literature for other valid and reliable scales that are used in different sectors and may be applicable to the examined domain. Other valuated and relevantly common used questionnaires we found in the bibliography were the Assistive Technology Device Predisposition Assessment- (ATDPA-) Device Form [ 57 , 58 ] and the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS) [ 59 ]. The ATDPA-Device Form is more relevant in context than the PIADS, targeting the evaluation of overall user experience with assistive technology, while PIADS only emphasizes the psychosocial impact of assistive devices, without targeting the evaluation of the actual experience of interacting with a robot device, but rather the impact that this interaction has on quality of life (QoL).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We should therefore look into the literature for other valid and reliable scales that are used in different sectors and may be applicable to the examined domain. Other valuated and relevantly common used questionnaires we found in the bibliography were the Assistive Technology Device Predisposition Assessment- (ATDPA-) Device Form [ 57 , 58 ] and the Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Devices Scale (PIADS) [ 59 ]. The ATDPA-Device Form is more relevant in context than the PIADS, targeting the evaluation of overall user experience with assistive technology, while PIADS only emphasizes the psychosocial impact of assistive devices, without targeting the evaluation of the actual experience of interacting with a robot device, but rather the impact that this interaction has on quality of life (QoL).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Assistive Technology Device Predisposition Assessment for device users (ATDPA) (Scherer, 2005) assessed satisfaction with positive impact made to different aspects of participants’ lives. This scale also has an excellent test–retest reliability and a relatively high internal consistency (Koumpouros et al, 2017). Both questionnaires used a 5-point Likert-type scale where ‘1’ = extremely satisfied and ‘5’ = extremely dissatisfied .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die Studien empfehlen, das MPT-Modell bzw. das ATD PA anzuwenden, um eine Nichtnutzung des Hilfsmittels zu vermeiden 1 , 3 , 57 , 9 . Insgesamt zeigt sich, dass der Bedarf nach einem Assessment zur Hilfsmittelversorgung vorhanden ist.…”
Section: Evidenzunclassified