2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnss.2016.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translation and psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Heart Failure-Specific Health Literacy Scale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The higher scores indicate higher health literacy. The Cronbach's ɑ for the Chinese version of this scale was 0.87 and the correlation coefficients between each item and the total score ranged from 0.61–0.91 (Yue et al, ).…”
Section: The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The higher scores indicate higher health literacy. The Cronbach's ɑ for the Chinese version of this scale was 0.87 and the correlation coefficients between each item and the total score ranged from 0.61–0.91 (Yue et al, ).…”
Section: The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It comprises three dimensions, functional, interactive and critical health literacy, with 12 items. This scale has been translated into Chinese and its psychometric properties have been validated (Yue, Zhang, Lu, & Jin, 2016). This is a self-report scale that uses four scoring options from 1 (inapplicable) -4 (strongly applicable).…”
Section: Heart Failure-specific Health Literacy Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the original scale, this item had a factor loading of 0.61. In the Persian version, the factor loadings of all items ranged between 0.56 and 0.88, and the factor loading of item 8 was the lowest compared to the other items (0.56) 24 . In the Chinese version, the factor loading of this item was 0.553 and was lower than other items 24 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In the Persian version, the factor loadings of all items ranged between 0.56 and 0.88, and the factor loading of item 8 was the lowest compared to the other items (0.56) 24 . In the Chinese version, the factor loading of this item was 0.553 and was lower than other items 24 . The eight items in the original and other versions were not removed from the scale, and the number of items remained 12 as in the original scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation