Translation, Adaptation, and Reliability of Modern Standard Arabic Version of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire

Abbad, Hani Al

doi:10.4172/2165-7025.1000254

Cited by 5 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…These results were in disagreement with the findings of the previous studies. In 2015, Al-Abbad and Al-Howimel [22] assessed the reliability of the Arabic version of RMDQ for chronic LBP patients. They reported a positive association between VAS and RMDQ scores (r = 0.299; P < 0.06).…”

Section: Results Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Responsiveness of Arabic Instruments for Pain and Disability in Patients With Low Back Pain

Alanazi¹,

Amer

2020

International Journal of Physiotherapy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ), Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QDS), and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) is widely used in patients with low back pain (LBP) to assess the level of disability. Nonetheless, there are limited data about the responsiveness properties of the Arabic versions of these scales. This study was conducted to assess the responsiveness of the Arabic versions of the FABQ, QDS, and RMDQ compared to that of the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Methods: A sample of 68 patients with LBP completed FABQ, QDS, RMDQ, and VAS at baseline and after 14 days. Responsiveness was evaluated by calculating the standard error of measurement (SEM), the minimal detectable difference at 95% confidence level (MDD95%), standardized response mean (SRM), Cohen's effect size (ES), Guyatt's responsiveness index (GRI), area under the curve (AUC), and minimal clinically significant difference (MCID).

show abstract

Section: Results Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Responsiveness of Arabic Instruments for Pain and Disability in Patients With Low Back Pain

Alanazi¹,

Amer

2020

International Journal of Physiotherapy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…An interview questionnaire was utilized in this study. It consists of four parts: personal information (age, gender, educational level, marital status, working status), medical history and habits (smoking, history of other chronic illnesses, family history of mental illness, duration of low back pain, nature of the LBP, presence of associated somatic symptoms, cause of LBP and treatment of LBP), the Arabic validated version [20] of Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), [21,22] which is a tool consists of 24 items to assess disability caused by LBP while the greater levels of disability are indicated by higher numbers of statements marked by the patients on the scale with 0 means no disability while 24 means severe disability, [22] and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 which was used to assess depression among the patients. It can be completed in a few minutes and rapidly scored by the researcher.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prevalence, severity, and determinants of depressive disorder among patients with low back pain in Al-Qassim Region, Saudi Arabia

Naif

2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is a widespread health problem that poses a severe economic burden on both affected patients and their societies. A bidirectional relationship between depression and other chronic illnesses, including chronic LBP, has been suggested. However, the exact association between them remains unclear. Objectives: To investigate the association between depressive disorder and low back pain and its impact on disability of patients. Patients and methods: A cross-sectional study carried out in the orthopedic clinics of AlBadaya General Hospital, Qassim Region, Saudi Arabia, among a sample of patients with LBP throughout the period of the study (April-June 2024,). An interview questionnaire composed of four parts was utilized: personal information, medical history, and habits, the Arabic-validated version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), and the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ)-9 to assess depression. Results: A total of 365 patients were included in this study. Their age ranged between 18 and 85 years, with an arithmetic mean of 47.9 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10.4 years. Females represented 55.6% of them. The overall prevalence of depressive disorder among the participants was 56.2%, being mild in 40.3% of patients and moderately severe or severe among 2.7% of them. The disability score ranged between 0 and 24 with an arithmetic mean of 10.7 and SD of 6.2, while its median 1 value was 11, and its interquartile range was 6-15.5. Patients with moderately severe/severe depression had the highest disability score (median value was 15 and the mean rank was 243.25), while those with no depression had the lowest disability score (median value was seven and mean rank was 130.62), p<0.001. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that with each unit increase in disability score, there was a 20% increase in depression (Adjusted odds ratio "AOR" =1.20; 95% confidence interval "CI": 1.14-1.26), p<0.001. Conclusion: Depression is very commonly associated with chronic LBP, although it is mostly mild. Disability is a serious complication of chronic LBP, and its severity is associated with the degree of depression. Therefore, patients with chronic LBP should be screened for depression.

show abstract

“…It focuses on specific items of physical functions, such as walking, bending over, sitting, lying down, dressing, sleeping, self-care, and daily activities [16]. We used the Arabic-validated version [17]. The scale is formed of 24 items, and the patient was instructed to mark only in front of an appropriate statement describing her condition.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prevalence of sacroiliac dysfunction during pregnancy

Hamdy¹,

Shawky²,

Ali³

et al. 2023

It Journ Gyn Obs

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective. To estimate the prevalence of sacroiliac dysfunction during pregnancy in Egypt. Materials and Methods. This was a cross-sectional observational study recruiting 861 pregnant women who attended the Obstetrics and Gynecology Department's outpatient clinic at Suez Canal University Hospitals from August 2016 to March 2020. Pain provocation tests were performed, including distraction test, Patrick Faber test, posterior pain provocation test, compression test, and active straight leg raising test. The reference criteria of three or more positive pain-provoking tests have high validity for the diagnosis. The primary outcome measurement was the prevalence of sacroiliac dysfunction during pregnancy. Results. 861 pregnant women were involved in this study, with 26.2 ± 6 years. The distraction test, Patrick Faber test, and posterior pain provocation test were the most positive tests (59.1%, 57.1%, and 51%, respectively). Three hundred twenty-four cases were found to have three or more positive pain provocation tests. The prevalence of sacroiliac dysfunction was 37.6%. Conclusions. Sacroiliac dysfunction commonly occurs among pregnant women in Egypt.

show abstract

Translation, Adaptation, and Reliability of Modern Standard Arabic Version of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire

Cited by 5 publications

References 19 publications

Responsiveness of Arabic Instruments for Pain and Disability in Patients With Low Back Pain

Responsiveness of Arabic Instruments for Pain and Disability in Patients With Low Back Pain

Prevalence, severity, and determinants of depressive disorder among patients with low back pain in Al-Qassim Region, Saudi Arabia

Prevalence of sacroiliac dysfunction during pregnancy

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About