2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2022.10.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translation—A tug of war during viral infection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 146 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many biological processes are known to cause global shutdown of translation initiation, including widespread protein misfolding in the ER, nutrient starvation and viral infection (Reid and Nicchitta, 2015; Shu et al, 2020; Walsh and Mohr, 2011). In many cases, a few mRNAs are thought to escape the global initiation shutdown, for example innate immune genes during viral infection (Rozman et al, 2023), but it has been difficult to assess translation elongation dynamics under such conditions with existing assays. We first asked whether global inhibition of translation affects elongation rates, for example by increasing the availability of charged tRNAs or elongation factors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many biological processes are known to cause global shutdown of translation initiation, including widespread protein misfolding in the ER, nutrient starvation and viral infection (Reid and Nicchitta, 2015; Shu et al, 2020; Walsh and Mohr, 2011). In many cases, a few mRNAs are thought to escape the global initiation shutdown, for example innate immune genes during viral infection (Rozman et al, 2023), but it has been difficult to assess translation elongation dynamics under such conditions with existing assays. We first asked whether global inhibition of translation affects elongation rates, for example by increasing the availability of charged tRNAs or elongation factors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much work has been done in animal virus systems, from which two main themes have emerged: The manipulation of RNA granule numbers during infection and the re-purposing of RNA granule components for viral replication (Figure 10). In animals, viruses are challenged with a translational shutdown of the cell upon infection initiation (Rozman et al, 2022), often leading to an initial increase of SGs, before viral counter mechanisms reduce SG numbers, either through cleavage of SG components (White et al, 2007), forced translation (Montero et al, 2008) or antagonizing key signalling steps in SG formation (Khaperskyy et al, 2012). Mammarenaviruses can evade even the initial SG induction through rapid and effective suppression of SG formation (Linero et al, 2011).…”
Section: Rna Granules On a Scale From Pro-to Anti-virallearning From ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Viruses lack biosynthetic capabilities and depend upon the host translation machinery for protein synthesis. To coerce the host translational machinery into synthesizing viral proteins, many positive‐sense RNA viruses have evolved various translation strategies, such as cap‐independent translation and translational recoding (Rozman et al., 2023; Stern‐Ginossar et al., 2019; Urquidi‐Camacho et al., 2020). Cap‐independent translation in plant RNA viruses lacking the 5′ cap is often mediated by internal ribosome entry sites (IRESs) and/or 3′ cap‐independent translation enhancers (CITEs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%