1986
DOI: 10.1097/01241398-198603000-00016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we reviewed classic articles in the field where methods were originally described, as well as commonly used variations. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] The choice of articles for this section was made jointly by the authors. Second, we mapped the contemporary variations in terminology from the field by performing an electronic literature search in May 2021 that covered the past 10 years using PubMed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we reviewed classic articles in the field where methods were originally described, as well as commonly used variations. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] The choice of articles for this section was made jointly by the authors. Second, we mapped the contemporary variations in terminology from the field by performing an electronic literature search in May 2021 that covered the past 10 years using PubMed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and P.A.). The parameters measured were Sharp acetabular angle (SA), Hilgenreiner acetabular index (AI), Reimer migration percentage (also known as Reimer’s index) (MP) and the lateral center-edge angle of Wiberg (CE) 21–24. For the CE angle, AI, SA, and MP the bony edge was used rather than the sourcil 25…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parameters measured were Sharp acetabular angle (SA), Hilgenreiner acetabular index (AI), Reimer migration percentage (also known as Reimer's index) (MP) and the lateral center-edge angle of Wiberg (CE). [21][22][23][24] For the CE angle, AI, SA, and MP the bony edge was used rather than the sourcil. 25 Since the main purpose of the measurements was to evaluate the persistent stability of the osteotomy we used multiple parameters.…”
Section: Radiographic Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Radiographic examination (anteroposterior and frog leg lateral X-rays) was performed after the cessation of the treatment with PH, at the end of the treatment with hip abduction orthosis, and at the final follow-up visit. In order to assess residual acetabular dysplasia, the acetabular index (AI) as described by Hilgenreiner was measured on all AP radiographs (11). The Kalamchi and MacEwen classification were also used to examine avascular necrosis of the femoral head (AVN) (12).…”
Section: Management Protocol and Primary Outcome Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the Graf classification, DDH was determined as Type D in 18 hips (52%), Type IIIa in 5 hips, Type IIIB in 3 (24%) and Type IV in 8 (24%). Of these 34 hips, 28 (82%) were treated successfully using PH, with a mean application time of 11.24 weeks (range, [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]. The success rate of PH treatment was determined as 82% (28/34 hips).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%