2022
DOI: 10.3233/shti220035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translating the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership – Common Data Model (OMOP-CDM) Electronic Health Records to an OWL Ontology

Abstract: The heterogeneity of electronic health records model is a major problem: it is necessary to gather data from various models for clinical research, but also for clinical decision support. The Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership – Common Data Model (OMOP-CDM) has emerged as a standard model for structuring health records populated from various other sources. This model is proposed as a relational database schema. However, in the field of decision support, formal ontologies are commonly used. In this paper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 1–4 However, this potential is often not realised due to the inherent complexity of EMR databases—that comprise thousands of data elements across thousands of proprietary tables—where vast amount of data needs to be transformed, cleaned and restructured to make it ‘fit’ for ‘secondary use’. 5 For highly powered collaborative research, where large volumes of EMR data are combined, use is further constrained by the heterogeneity of each institution’s EMR schema 6 ; concern over data sharing and privacy breaches and lack of clarity over governance and consent. 7 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 1–4 However, this potential is often not realised due to the inherent complexity of EMR databases—that comprise thousands of data elements across thousands of proprietary tables—where vast amount of data needs to be transformed, cleaned and restructured to make it ‘fit’ for ‘secondary use’. 5 For highly powered collaborative research, where large volumes of EMR data are combined, use is further constrained by the heterogeneity of each institution’s EMR schema 6 ; concern over data sharing and privacy breaches and lack of clarity over governance and consent. 7 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] However, this potential is often not realised due to the inherent complexity of EMR databases-that comprise thousands of data elements across thousands of proprietary tables-where vast amount of data needs to be transformed, cleaned and restructured to make it 'fit' for 'secondary use'. 5 For highly powered collaborative research, where large volumes of EMR data are combined, use is further constrained by the heterogeneity of each institution's EMR schema 6 ; concern over data sharing and privacy breaches and lack of clarity over governance and consent. 7 The Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) consortium 8 is addressing these challenges through the transformation of each EMR database into the open-source OMOP-CDM, where EMR data elements are translated into the OMOP-CDM using standardised terminologies such as SNOMED-CT, 9 LOINC 10 or RxNORM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%