Translating religion and development: Emerging perspectives from critical ethnographies of faith-based organizations

Abstract

Since the turn of the twenty-first century, there has been a remarkable surge of interest among both policy makers and academics on religion and its engagements with development. Within this context, ‘religious non-governmental organizations (RNGOs)’ or ‘faith-based organizations’ (FBOs) have garnered considerable attention. Early attempts to understand FBOs often took the form of typological mapping exercises, the cumulative effect of which has been the construction of a field of ‘RNGOs’ that can be analysed as distinct from—and possibly put into the service of—the work of purportedly secular development actors. However, such typologies imply problematic distinctions between over-determined imaginations of separate spheres of ‘religion’ and ‘development’. In this article, we innovatively extend the potential of ethnographic approaches highlighting aspects of ‘brokerage’ and ‘translation’ to FBOs and identify new, productive tensions of convergent analysis. These, we argue, provide original possibilities of comparison and meta-analysis to explore contemporary entanglements of religion and development. This article was written as part of a broader research project on Religion and NGOs in Asia. We are grateful to the Henry R. Luce Initiative on Religion in International Affairs at the Henry Luce Foundation for their generous support of this research. We would also like to thank Philip Fountain and other members of the National University of Singapore’s Asia Research Institute for stimulating conversations that have informed our thinking in this article, and the anonymous reviewers for PIDS who have helped us to improve on earlier drafts.

Giving Religion a Place in Development Cooperation: The Perspective of Belgian NGOs

“…Often critical in nature, such research provides an empirical, on-the-ground understanding of the entanglements of religion and development in specific times, places and cultural contexts. While ethnographies of FBOs in particular, problematize seemingly clear-cut dichotomies and unwrap how concepts like religion and development are understood and contested by different actors and stakeholders, their micro-approach also has its limitations (Bolotta et al, 2019).…”

Religion and Development: Alternative Visions, Credibility, and Networks as Religious Assets for Sustainable Development?

“…The narratives described above interpret these developments in line with secularization and de-secularization theories. However, there is much value in going beyond this dichotomy in research on religion and development in order to generate alternative frameworks that consider the increasing engagement of FBOs in different social settings (Bolotta et al, 2019). New institutional theory and field approaches can help to provide such frameworks by emphasizing that religious organizations move between different social fields and face pressures to adapt their actions to the different institutional logics (DiMaggio and Powell, 1983; Fligstein and McAdam, 2012).…”

“Dale tu mano al indio”

“…Paralelamente, y sin especial conexión con la vertiente anglosajona de antropología del cristianismo, una arena de investigaciones centró su análisis en las articulaciones entre instituciones religiosas (o basadas-en--la-fe), agencias de cooperación internacional y proyectos de desarrollo social (Borstein, 2003;Occhipinti, 2005;Scherz, 2014;Barroso, 2015). En este espacio temático de "religión y desarrollo", los estudios examinaron desde enfoques teóricos divergentes las estrategias dinámicas en las políticas y discursos misioneros sobre el desarrollo, como también el rol de las ONGs basadas-en-la-fe en el entramado de relaciones interétnicas entre pueblos indígenas y campesinos (Occhipinti, 2011;Braticevic, 2011;Bolotta, Cheer & Fenner, 2019;Barroso & Abrantes 2020). Si la antropología del cristianismo es una corriente emergente de la larga discusión disciplinar sobre la religión como hecho sociocultural e histórico, los estudios sobre "religión y desarrollo" responden a interrogantes surgidos, principalmente, en los development studies, con sus enfoques desde la antropología, la ciencia política y la sociología (Tomalin, 2015).…”