2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11684-011-0146-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Translating evidence into policy in China: opportunities and challenges

Abstract: Research and evidence are critical for the formulation of policies and practices in support of health care. In the past two decades, the Chinese Clinical Epidemiology Network has been promoting evidence-based policy making in China. Evidence-based policy has become a major part of the government's approach to policy making. The current article addresses the translation of evidence into health policies based on the expansion of evidence-based medicine in China. It also discusses the opportunities and challenges… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An identified barrier to the provision of scientific evidence to policymakers is that research is reliant on available funding and staff, both of which are limited. Furthermore, the translation of research into evidence‐based policy and decision‐making in China is dependent upon the dissemination and advocacy of high‐quality evidence from researchers to well‐informed policymakers, Government support and recognition by researchers of how institutional factors affect policy decisions (Wang and Jin, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An identified barrier to the provision of scientific evidence to policymakers is that research is reliant on available funding and staff, both of which are limited. Furthermore, the translation of research into evidence‐based policy and decision‐making in China is dependent upon the dissemination and advocacy of high‐quality evidence from researchers to well‐informed policymakers, Government support and recognition by researchers of how institutional factors affect policy decisions (Wang and Jin, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%