1996
DOI: 10.1080/03075079612331381251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transitions in students' learning styles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Again, there is only very limited understanding of why differences in the level and content of tacit knowledge occur across individuals who appear to have similar abilities and experiences (Hedlund et al, 2001;Wagner & Sternberg, 1985). There is widespread evidence to suggest that this may be due to the different learning styles of individuals (Kolb & Kolb, 2005;Kolb, 1984) because when learners are matched with environments that complement their unique learning styles, they achieve significantly higher learning outcomes (Nulty & Barrett, 1996;Dunn & Griggs, 2003). Learning style is believed to represent the interface between cognitive style and the external learning environment, and hence contextualises individual differences in learning (Sadler-Smith, 2001).…”
Section: Figure 1 About Herementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again, there is only very limited understanding of why differences in the level and content of tacit knowledge occur across individuals who appear to have similar abilities and experiences (Hedlund et al, 2001;Wagner & Sternberg, 1985). There is widespread evidence to suggest that this may be due to the different learning styles of individuals (Kolb & Kolb, 2005;Kolb, 1984) because when learners are matched with environments that complement their unique learning styles, they achieve significantly higher learning outcomes (Nulty & Barrett, 1996;Dunn & Griggs, 2003). Learning style is believed to represent the interface between cognitive style and the external learning environment, and hence contextualises individual differences in learning (Sadler-Smith, 2001).…”
Section: Figure 1 About Herementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As stated by Kolb, workers in the field of education are expected to have accommodating learning style, which is a combination of concrete experience and active experimentation because the profession of teaching is not just about transferring what one knows. Smilarly, Nulty and Barrett [66] and Kruzich et al [67] concluded that field of education were predominantly accommodating.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Nulty and Barrett (1996) cautioned that the learning style grouping should not be taken as an absolute representation of a particular student population, because different teaching strategies and discourse modes may be adopted that are not traditional to that discipline. However, it is important to account for learners' different learning styles and their learning preferences in the planning of learning and teaching processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there are different opinions emerged in previous studies about the learning styles of geographers. For Kolb (1981), geography is an assimilative discipline; by contrast, Nulty and Barrett (1996) drew on the earlier work of Cullen, Pearson, Saha and Spear (1994) concluded that geography students are predominantly accommodating learners, while Healey, Kneale and Bradbeer (2005) reported that the dominant learning style of geography undergraduates was assimilating. In addition, Dunphy and Spellman (2009) examined the relationship between the perception of the 'value' of fieldwork and the learning styles of geography undergraduates studying in British universities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%