Transitioning to low-GWP alternatives with enhanced energy efficiency in cooling non-residential buildings of China

Abstract

The electricity demand for space cooling in the non-residential building (NRB) sector of China is growing significantly and is becoming increasingly critical with rapid economic development and mounting impacts of climate change. The growing demand for space cooling will increase global warming due to emissions of hydrofluorocarbons used in cooling equipment and carbon dioxide emissions from the mostly fossil fuel-based electricity currently powering space cooling. This study uses the Greenhouse Gas and Air Pollution Interaction and Synergies (GAINS) model framework to estimate current and future emissions of hydrofluorocarbons and their abatement potentials for space cooling in the NRB sector of China and assess the co-benefits in the form of savings in electricity and associated reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG), air pollution, and short-lived climate pollutant emissions. Co-benefits of space cooling are assessed by taking into account (a) regional and urban/rural heterogeneities and climatic zones among different provinces; (b) technical/economic energy efficiency improvements of the cooling technologies; and (c) transition towards lower global warming potential (GWP) refrigerants under the Kigali Amendment. Under the business-as-usual (BAU) scenario, the total energy consumption for space cooling in the NRB sector will increase from 166 TWh in 2015 to 564 TWh in 2050, primarily due to the rapid increase in the floor space area of non-residential buildings. The total GHG mitigation potential due to the transition towards low-GWP refrigerants and technical energy efficiency improvement of cooling technologies will approximately be equal to 10% of the total carbon emissions from the building sector of China in 2050.

The Interconnection between Energy Efficiency and CO2 Mitigation in the Development of Multifamily Buildings

“…On the other hand, William et al [1], [12], [15] highlight that those buildings are responsible for consuming approximately 30.00% and 40.00% of global energy production, contributing to a considerable amount of greenhouse gas emissions, about 19.00%. Various strategies have been proposed in buildings to address this challenge, including energy, water, and material efficiency measures.…”

Prediction and Optimization Analysis of the Performance of an Office Building in an Extremely Hot and Cold Region

“…At the level of carbon emissions from buildings, excessive carbon emissions can lead to a sharp increase in greenhouse gases and waste of energy resources, which in turn can lead to building environmental problems such as the heat island effect. The issue of how to effectively reduce carbon emissions is critical to improving building performance [18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. For example, the following scholars have conducted relevant studies: Zhang et al investigated the impact of three objectives, GWP, global cost (GC), and operational energy (OE), on the ability to optimize building performance.…”

“…Wang et al examined the abatement potential of HFC emissions. The results indicated that the total GHG reduction capacity by 2050 is approximately equal to 10% of the total carbon emissions from the Chinese construction sector [24]. Honarvar et al examined the evolution of buildings over their life cycle, and the results showed that the environmental impact of new materials increases fivefold in terms of GWP.…”