2016
DOI: 10.1002/eat.22596
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transitioning from DSM‐IV to DSM‐5: A systematic review of eating disorder prevalence assessment

Abstract: Objective: The objective of this study was to systematically review the literature on assessment of eating disorder prevalence during the DSM-IV era .Method: A PubMed search was conducted targeting articles on prevalence, incidence and epidemiology of eating disorders. The review was performed in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, and was limited to DSM-IV based eating disorder diagnoses published between 1994 and 2015.Results: A total of 74 studies fulfilled inclusion criteria and were included in the study. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 131 publications
(117 reference statements)
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was expected because individuals engaging in restrictive eating were oversampled for the original study (Haynos, Hill, & Fruzzetti, ). Eating disorder prevalence rates matched community estimates (Lindvall, Dahlgren, & Wisting, ). The majority of participants reported supporting menu labeling and looking up calorie information on their own.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…This was expected because individuals engaging in restrictive eating were oversampled for the original study (Haynos, Hill, & Fruzzetti, ). Eating disorder prevalence rates matched community estimates (Lindvall, Dahlgren, & Wisting, ). The majority of participants reported supporting menu labeling and looking up calorie information on their own.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…(Lindvall Dahlgren & Wisting, 2016;Smink, van Hoeken, & Hoek, 2013;Smink et al, 2012). Most of the suicide attemptrelated hospitalizations were observed in female patients and were most common among patients with a diagnosis of BN (10.1% of AN hospitalizations) or AN (5.2% of BN hospitalizations) ( We observed that unspecified ED represents a significant proportion of all hospitalizations related to EDs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The latter were modified in 2013 with the most notable change being the addition of BED as a proper diagnosis 7. The update likely impacts overall prevalence and trend estimates,37 compounding the challenges regarding epidemiological data collection and ED burden quantification methodology 38. Next, the SCOFF is posited to identify likely ED cases at a given point in time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%