Transitional Surgery Clinic Reduces Readmissions

Hanlon, Erin; Rosenberger, Sarah; Neuzil, Daniel F.; Nair, Priya; Fisher, G J; Qunamague, Maria Azenith

doi:10.1016/j.jvn.2017.04.026

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…More than attempting to regulate content, a number of experts suggest that increasing transparency can reduce the threat of manipulation. 225 Therefore, subversive and deceptive information operations, such as those carried out by the Russian Internet Research Agency, should be qualified as crossing the line into prohibited interference. 226 This argument finds further support in international human rights practice with regard to the right of political participation pursuant to Article 25 of the ICCPR.…”

Section: The Way Forward: Prospects For International Norm Buildingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Information Operations and the Question of Illegitimate Interference under International Law

Lahmann

2020

Isr. law rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article examines the legal qualification of state-led information operations that aim to undermine democratic decision-making processes in other states. After a survey of the legal attitudes of states towards such operations during the Cold War, the impact of the digital transformation on the frequency and quality of information operations is explained. The article assesses scholarly responses to the outlined paradigm shift regarding the prohibition of intervention, respect for sovereignty, and the principle of self-determination. The study then inquires whether it is possible to detect a change in how states qualify adversarial information operations by tracking recent state practice and official statements of opinio juris. The survey concludes that there is insufficient uniformity to allow for an inference that the content of the analysed rules of customary international law has already shifted towards more restrictive treatment of foreign interference. As a possible way forward, the article ends with a proposal to focus on deceptive and manipulative conduct of information operations as the most viable path to outlaw such state behaviour in the future. Instead of attempting to regulate the content of information, this approach is better suited to safeguard freedom of speech and other potentially affected civil rights.

show abstract

Section: The Way Forward: Prospects For International Norm Buildingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Information Operations and the Question of Illegitimate Interference under International Law

Lahmann

2020

Isr. law rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Transitional Surgery Clinic Reduces Readmissions

Cited by 1 publication

References 0 publications

Information Operations and the Question of Illegitimate Interference under International Law

Information Operations and the Question of Illegitimate Interference under International Law

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About