2018 Applied Aerodynamics Conference 2018
DOI: 10.2514/6.2018-2846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transitional Delayed Detached Eddy Simulation of Multielement, High-Lift Airfoils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lack of reliability of current models to predict laminar-to-turbulent transition over the flight envelop of aircraft is still limiting the extent to which design can rely on computational tools, while making costly wind tunnel and flight tests a necessity [2]. Prediction of transition on practical three-dimensional wing geometries using the e N method coupled with laminar boundary layer and linear stability codes [3,4] or local statistical correlation CFD models such as the γ − Re θ Langtry-Menter model [5] have proven challenging [6][7][8], whereas transitional hybrid RANS-LES solvers have shown encouraging but still mitigated results [9][10][11]. The crossflow models implemented in RANS solvers [12,13,15,16] account for the effect of roughness in a somewhat rudimentary way.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lack of reliability of current models to predict laminar-to-turbulent transition over the flight envelop of aircraft is still limiting the extent to which design can rely on computational tools, while making costly wind tunnel and flight tests a necessity [2]. Prediction of transition on practical three-dimensional wing geometries using the e N method coupled with laminar boundary layer and linear stability codes [3,4] or local statistical correlation CFD models such as the γ − Re θ Langtry-Menter model [5] have proven challenging [6][7][8], whereas transitional hybrid RANS-LES solvers have shown encouraging but still mitigated results [9][10][11]. The crossflow models implemented in RANS solvers [12,13,15,16] account for the effect of roughness in a somewhat rudimentary way.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%