2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.08.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transition to adult life of young people leaving foster care: A qualitative systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
67
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
67
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Two groups of young people were identified. The first are those who experienced their transition as a possibility for a new beginning of life (Häggman-Laitila et al 2018). They were self-confident, had positive future expectations and had the inner strength to build a better daily life and identity for themselves; they thus had a growing sense of hope.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Two groups of young people were identified. The first are those who experienced their transition as a possibility for a new beginning of life (Häggman-Laitila et al 2018). They were self-confident, had positive future expectations and had the inner strength to build a better daily life and identity for themselves; they thus had a growing sense of hope.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They had learnt from their past experiences and could enhance their strengths. The second group of young people consisted of those who described the transition as a negative change in their life situation (Häggman-Laitila et al 2018). They felt insecure about their future, received no support in dealing with the challenges of daily living, were socially isolated and had constant housing problems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These discouraging findings have prompted governments to address these concerns; positioning this population at the forefront of policy and legislation [9,10]. Yet despite being classified as a high-risk group; factors such as multiple placements, residential moves, poor screening in development and education, delays in service provision, limited data collation, consent and segregated service sectors are still suggested to contribute to these outcomes [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%