1997
DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.1997.02170490073013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transition to a Computer-Based Record Using Scannable, Structured Encounter Forms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11,[19][20][21][22] Both improved training and standardized medical record forms, which prompt physicians on age-appropriate advice, might help. 23 Incorporating anticipatory guidance into quality assessment systems would create additional incentives for physicians and health care organizations to deliver guidance. [24][25][26] Second, physicians may not be confident that their advice will be useful.…”
Section: Possible Reasons Anticipatory Guidance Is Not Providedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11,[19][20][21][22] Both improved training and standardized medical record forms, which prompt physicians on age-appropriate advice, might help. 23 Incorporating anticipatory guidance into quality assessment systems would create additional incentives for physicians and health care organizations to deliver guidance. [24][25][26] Second, physicians may not be confident that their advice will be useful.…”
Section: Possible Reasons Anticipatory Guidance Is Not Providedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,10,27,28 Evidence for their effect on outcomes is sparse. 15,29 Data Standards and Equity Data standards can have 2 basic effects on equity in the health care system, that is, ensuring that information systems provide the same levels of benefits to all populations (via functional standards) and making regional health data interchange networks possible (via messaging and terminology standards).…”
Section: Data Standards and Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Typing with keyboards has itself its own limitations, and reuse of pre-saved sentences or copyand-pasting other parts of the record are major sources of errors in the EMR (Hammond et al 2003). In order to overcome these problems, some EMRs have used a Research structured data entry system for the interim history, risk assessment, developmental screening and guidance sections of the record, which has resulted in better documentation in the EMR when compared with the PMR (Adams, Mann & Bauchner 2003;Johnson & Cowan 2002;Shiffman, Brandt & Freeman 1997;Bauchner Kanegaye et al 2005). However, the patient's chief complaint and present illness were freely documented in the legacy PMR and were recorded with narrative text rather than the structured data as seen in the EMR.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%