2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevc.97.034330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transition sum rules in the shell model

Abstract: An important characterization of electromagnetic and weak transitions in atomic nuclei are sum rules. We focus on the non-energy-weighted sum rule (NEWSR), or total strength, and the energyweighted sum rule (EWSR); the ratio of the EWSR to the NEWSR is the centroid or average energy of transition strengths from an nuclear initial state to all allowed final states. These sum rules can be expressed as expectation values of operators, in the case of the EWSR a double commutator. While most prior applications of t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
19
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
2
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, compared * E-mail: toishi@phy.hr † E-mail: npaar@phy.hr with the electric dipole (E1) and quadrupole (E2) modes [28][29][30][31][32][33][34], the knowledge on the pairing effect on magnetic modes, as well as on unnatural-parity states, is rather limited [10][11][12]20]. In studies of nuclear modes of excitation, the sum rules associated to the transition strength and energyweighted sum rules, represent an essential tool for the analyses of the excitations, not only as benchmark tests of the theoretical frameworks involved, but also to inspect the completeness of the experimental data [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48]. Over the past decades, the analyses of the sum rules have been mandatory to validate theoretical approaches to describe various modes of excitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, compared * E-mail: toishi@phy.hr † E-mail: npaar@phy.hr with the electric dipole (E1) and quadrupole (E2) modes [28][29][30][31][32][33][34], the knowledge on the pairing effect on magnetic modes, as well as on unnatural-parity states, is rather limited [10][11][12]20]. In studies of nuclear modes of excitation, the sum rules associated to the transition strength and energyweighted sum rules, represent an essential tool for the analyses of the excitations, not only as benchmark tests of the theoretical frameworks involved, but also to inspect the completeness of the experimental data [35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48]. Over the past decades, the analyses of the sum rules have been mandatory to validate theoretical approaches to describe various modes of excitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, by going up to systematically higher initial energies, recent work on several transition operators (electric quadrupole, magnetic dipole, and Gamow-Teller) has provided both numerical evidence and mathematical arguments that the sum rules are not and cannot be independent of energy. However, it is crucial to note that the sum rules evolve smoothly with energy, exhibiting robust fluctuations, by which we mean that the fluctuations calculated in an energy bin are insensitive to the bin size [21,32]. This observation leads to a modification of the Brink-Axel hypothesis, as we discuss in the next section.…”
Section: A Strength Functions and The Brink-axel Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 91%
“…As a test of the Brink-Axel hypothesis in calculations, one can consider moments or sum rules of the strength function, specifically the non-energy-weighted sum rule or total strength, S 0 (E i ) = B(E i , E tr ) dE tr , and the energyweighted sum rule, S 1 (E i ) = E tr B(E i , E tr ) dE tr . Both are convenient to write as expectation values and so one can efficiently evaluate the sum rules for many states [21,32]. If the Brink-Axel hypothesis were true, the sum rules would be independent of the initial energy E i .…”
Section: A Strength Functions and The Brink-axel Hypothesismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can get around this limitation by using sum rules [11,12,13]. Let Ô be some transition operator, and let {|n } be eigenstates of a Hamiltonian Ĥ with energies E n .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ô † , Ĥ , Ô for general one-body transition operators, including nonscalar operators with nonzero angular momentum rank, and general 1+2-body Hamiltonians [13]. This allows one to efficiently compute the NEWSR and EWSR for many nuclei for arbitrary one-body transitions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%