1993
DOI: 10.1063/1.464557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transition state structures and energetics using Gaussian-2 theory

Abstract: The availability of the easily implemented Gaussian-2 (G2) methodology has made it possible for the nonspecialist to calculate accurate heats of formation for many molecules on workstations. In order to quantify its performance for transition state structures, we have used G2 and a modified G2 on several transition states whose structures and energies have been well characterized either by experiment or multireference configuration interaction studies. The G2 method performs well in predicting energies of tran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
90
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…G2Q is a modified G2 method for the purpose of precisely predicting the energetics of transition states involving difficult open shell species based on the geometries and ZPE calculated at the QCISD/6-311G(d,p) level. 34,53 G2͑PU͒ is used for the same purpose as G2Q but using the PMP4 method instead of only UMP4 ͑there is no difference using either PMP4 or UMP4 method for the close shell species͒ for the various levels of the energy corrections to better improve the uncertainties caused by the spin contamination of the open shell species ͓original G2͑PU͒ was based on the geometry and ZPE calculated at the UMP2/6-311G(d,p) level͔. 35 The results of the relative energy of 1 are Ϫ44.8 and Ϫ44.9 kcal mol Ϫ1 , predicted at the G2Q and G2͑PU͒ levels, respectively.…”
Section: B Intermediate H 2 Nnomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…G2Q is a modified G2 method for the purpose of precisely predicting the energetics of transition states involving difficult open shell species based on the geometries and ZPE calculated at the QCISD/6-311G(d,p) level. 34,53 G2͑PU͒ is used for the same purpose as G2Q but using the PMP4 method instead of only UMP4 ͑there is no difference using either PMP4 or UMP4 method for the close shell species͒ for the various levels of the energy corrections to better improve the uncertainties caused by the spin contamination of the open shell species ͓original G2͑PU͒ was based on the geometry and ZPE calculated at the UMP2/6-311G(d,p) level͔. 35 The results of the relative energy of 1 are Ϫ44.8 and Ϫ44.9 kcal mol Ϫ1 , predicted at the G2Q and G2͑PU͒ levels, respectively.…”
Section: B Intermediate H 2 Nnomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 In order to obtain more reliable energies, the Gaussian-2 ͑G2͒ type methodology [33][34][35][36][37][38][39] has also been implemented in this study. The conventional G2 method 33 uses a series of ab initio calculations with various basis sets to approximate a QCISD͑T͒/ 6-311ϩG(3d f ,2p)//MP2/6-31G(d) calculation with an additional ''higher level correction'' ͑HLC͒ based on the number of paired and unpaired electrons.…”
Section: Computational Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure and force constants for the oxiryl radical and for the transition state for ring formation have been calculated. 41 The thermodynamic estimates for the transition state were carried out using the G2/G2Q method, 42 and frequencies were derived at the QCISD/6-311G(d,p) level. These frequencies can be used as a qualitative guide for a possible transition state to isomerization, but they do not necessarily represent the actual transition state.…”
Section: ͑14͒mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The geometry optimizations were performed at the QCISD/6-311G(d,p) level, which is the same as that used by Durant and Rohlfing for their G2Q formulation of G2 theory ͑ZPE corrections for the TS were taken from the QCISD frequency calculations͒. The barrier heights found at the CBS-QCI/APNO level are compared to values from G2Q, 13 G2M ͑where available͒, 4 and 17 which might be an insufficiency in the reference selection in the CCI procedure as discussed by Durant and Rohlfing, 10,14 leading to an error of 3.0 kcal in the energy of the NHϩNO asymptote. When referring the TS energy to the HϩN 2 O, the CBS-QCI/APNO and G2Q results are in excellent agreement with the CASSCF value.…”
Section: B Transition Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These transition states had been addressed by Durant and Rohlfing when evaluating the reliability of G2 and its G2Q derivative. 10,14 A subset of these species had been reinvestigated by Durant using DFT methods. 15 We included the hydrocarbon radical hydrogen transfer reaction between C 2 H 4 and C 2 H 5 as an additional system that previously had been treated at a high level of theory.…”
Section: B Transition Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%