2004
DOI: 10.2307/3738992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transition Relevance Places and Overlapping in (Spanish-English) Conversational Etiquette

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Authors who consider Spanish as a positive politeness language and English as a negative politeness one are Walters (1979), Hickey (1991) Haverkate (1998), Portolés and Vázquez (2000) and Ardila (2004), among others.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors who consider Spanish as a positive politeness language and English as a negative politeness one are Walters (1979), Hickey (1991) Haverkate (1998), Portolés and Vázquez (2000) and Ardila (2004), among others.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a study of a variety of Peninsular Spanish, Cestero Mancera (1994) found that 46 percent (245/531) of turns were exchanged with a speaker completing the turn before the second speaker began to speak, and a nearly equal number of turns, 43 percent, (226/531) were overlapped by a following speaker. Ardila (2004) compared political debates in Peninsular Spanish and British English and reported that overlaps were more frequent in Spanish: in the Spanish debates talk, overlaps during another speaker's turn occurred every 22.72 seconds, compared with every 136.36 seconds in the English debates. Ardila also reported that overlaps in Spanish tended to be longer than in English: in Spanish they continued for more than 5 seconds, whereas in English they were seldom longer than 1 second; the longest overlaps in Spanish ranged from 11.70 to 20.55 seconds, while the longest overlaps in English were between 5.79 and 9.51 seconds.…”
Section: Sociocultural Variationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Overlaps can be supportive and cooperative, or challenging" (Gibbons & Whiteley, 2018: 83). Besides, conversational etiquette is scrupulously observed in formal exchanges, and interrupting the speaker is considered a severe violation of etiquette (Ardila, 2004). Interlocutors tend to obey the sequences of transition in conversations, and exceptions are functional as participants perceive them as divergent from the expected flow (Enfiled & Sidnell, 2014).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%