2013
DOI: 10.1088/0029-5515/53/7/073014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transition of poloidal viscosity by electrode biasing in the Large Helical Device

Abstract: Electrode biasing experiments were carried out in various magnetic configurations on the Large Helical Device (LHD). The transitions of poloidal viscosity, which were accompanied with bifurcation phenomena characterized by a negative resistance in an electrode characteristic, were clearly observed on LHD by the electrode biasing. The critical external driving force required for transition was compared with the local maximum in ion viscosity, and the radial resistivity before the transition also compared with t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The radial electric field amplitude was varied between f e ≡ E r /E r0 = −20 to +20. Note that the poloidal Mach number of the E × B flow, M p = E r /(B p v th ), is at most 0.1, so the nonlinear dependence of neoclassical viscosity on the E × B speed when M p > 1 [25], discussed in the analysis of neoclassical poloidal viscosity in biasing experiments in many heliotron/stellarator devices such as [26][27][28] and references therein, does not matter in this benchmark. The profiles of NTV calculated from FORTEC-3D and Park's combined analytic formula are shown in figure 2.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The radial electric field amplitude was varied between f e ≡ E r /E r0 = −20 to +20. Note that the poloidal Mach number of the E × B flow, M p = E r /(B p v th ), is at most 0.1, so the nonlinear dependence of neoclassical viscosity on the E × B speed when M p > 1 [25], discussed in the analysis of neoclassical poloidal viscosity in biasing experiments in many heliotron/stellarator devices such as [26][27][28] and references therein, does not matter in this benchmark. The profiles of NTV calculated from FORTEC-3D and Park's combined analytic formula are shown in figure 2.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37 Main issue of this electrode biasing experiment itself is the control of the J Â B driving force for …”
Section: Meso-and Micro-scale Interactionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the poloidal flow can be externally varied, the phase of the magnetic island can be also arbitrarily controlled, which may permit continued utilization of the island divertor concept. One possibility for controlling the poloidal flow is imposing the radial electric field E r , which has been attempted in LHD [14], where the electrode is inserted inside the last closed flux surface. The new finding of the intermediate state brings a distinct paradigm shift in which the magnetic island can be moved and maintained in a partial position of the phase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%