Macromolecular Biorecognition 1987
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-4600-8_13
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transition of Chromatin from the “10 nm” Lower Order Structure, to the “30 nm” Higher Order Structure, as Followed by Small Angle X-Ray Scattering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
3
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus there was little evidence for aggregation. This result has been found for other types of chromatin at much higher concentrations (e.g., Suau et al, 1979;Gerchman and Ramakrishnan, 1987;Greulich et al, 1987;Koch et al, 1988).…”
Section: Radii Of Gyrationsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Thus there was little evidence for aggregation. This result has been found for other types of chromatin at much higher concentrations (e.g., Suau et al, 1979;Gerchman and Ramakrishnan, 1987;Greulich et al, 1987;Koch et al, 1988).…”
Section: Radii Of Gyrationsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The absolute mass per unit lengths of the fully compacted Thyone and Necturus models are in excellent agreement with STEM (Williams et al, 1986) and solution scattering results (Williams and Langmore, manuscript submitted for publication) obtained from isolated fibers prepared under conditions identical to those used for this diameter study. Other studies indicate consistently lower values for the mass per unit length (e.g., Suau et al, 1979;Greulich et al, 1987). However, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: The Crossed-linker Models Predict Fiber Diameters That Incresupporting
confidence: 56%
“…This peak corresponds to a spacing greater than 400 A, far larger than the linker length between nucleosomes. Similar peaks have been observed in x-ray data and used to support a loose three-dimensional model (12,13) but the assignment of this peak is uncertain (28). Because the peak observed in this work was more pronounced along the fiber axis, it is unlikely that it is due to an interfiber distance.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%