2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-022-04830-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transition metal-doped mesoporous TiO2 films fabricated through cellulose nanocrystal template synthesis: studies of physicochemical, spectrophotometric properties, and photocatalytic degradation activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen from Figure 3c and As shown in Figure 4, the FTIR spectra of RC, RCB, RCPB and RCPB/PAN/RCPB indicated that the introduction of nanoparticles did not change the structure of RC. Previous study has shown that the CH 2 infrared absorption peak at 1429 cm -1 is cellulose I, and at 1420 cm -1 is cellulose II (Yoon et al 2022;Nelson and O'Connor 1964). It can be seen from Figure 4a that the CH 2 absorption peak of the RC appeared at 1420 cm −1 , indicating that the NaOH/CO(NH 2 ) 2 system destroyed the intermolecular hydrogen bond of cotton short fiber and made the cellulose transformation from type I to type II completely.…”
Section: 1characterization Analysesmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…It can be seen from Figure 3c and As shown in Figure 4, the FTIR spectra of RC, RCB, RCPB and RCPB/PAN/RCPB indicated that the introduction of nanoparticles did not change the structure of RC. Previous study has shown that the CH 2 infrared absorption peak at 1429 cm -1 is cellulose I, and at 1420 cm -1 is cellulose II (Yoon et al 2022;Nelson and O'Connor 1964). It can be seen from Figure 4a that the CH 2 absorption peak of the RC appeared at 1420 cm −1 , indicating that the NaOH/CO(NH 2 ) 2 system destroyed the intermolecular hydrogen bond of cotton short fiber and made the cellulose transformation from type I to type II completely.…”
Section: 1characterization Analysesmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…P-type dopants, such as cobalt (Co 2+ ), chromium (Cr 3+ ), aluminum (Al 3+ ), or gallium (Ga 3+ ), in doped TiO 2 can perform as acceptor centers. 75 These cations can trap the photoelectrons and encourage the recombination of the photoelectrons and holes. In contrast, n-type dopants, known as the donor centers, including molybdenum (Mo 5+ ), antimony (Sb 5+ ), niobium (Nb 5+ ), tantalum (Ta 5+ ), and tungsten (W 6+ ), can trap the holes and hence enhance the recombination.…”
Section: Metal Ion-doped Tio 2 (M-doped Tio 2 )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, n-type dopants, known as the donor centers, including molybdenum (Mo 5+ ), antimony (Sb 5+ ), niobium (Nb 5+ ), tantalum (Ta 5+ ), and tungsten (W 6+ ), can trap the holes and hence enhance the recombination. 75,76 When doped with noble metal ions, TiO 2 is involved in the electron−hole pair separation event because Fermi levels are at different positions for TiO 2 and noble metal ions. 77 Furthermore, for higher loading of dopants (greater than 5%), the metal ion centers can become negatively charged and, consequently, attract positively charged holes to enhance the recombination potential.…”
Section: Metal Ion-doped Tio 2 (M-doped Tio 2 )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The energy αhv = B(hv − E g ) n differences are due to doping different metal ferrite and the size of particle (Bilal et al, 2022). The reason for these different energies has been attributed to the interactions between metal ferrite nanoparticles and AHB, also the difference in interaction strength (Yoon et al, 2022). These differences showed that the oscillation times, which determine the energy band gap, change.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%