2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcis.2020.09.114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transition metal-containing nitrogen-doped nanocarbon catalysts derived from 5-methylresorcinol for anion exchange membrane fuel cell application

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…flooding or drying) have a great influence on the overall fuel cell performance [42,43]. Considering these aspects together with different GDL material and gas flow rates can provide a possible explanation for the high Pmax of 415 mW cm −2 obtained with FeCoNC-at catalyst in an earlier investigation, where otherwise similar conditions to the present study were used [44]. Also, more than two times higher Pmax of FeCoNC-at compared to the Fe/Co/IL-CNF-800b could not be solely caused by the catalysts ORR activity as in the kinetically controlled region remarkably closer current density values at 0.85 V (J0.85V) around 60 mA cm -2 were observed for both catalysts.…”
Section: Aemfc Testingsupporting
confidence: 50%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…flooding or drying) have a great influence on the overall fuel cell performance [42,43]. Considering these aspects together with different GDL material and gas flow rates can provide a possible explanation for the high Pmax of 415 mW cm −2 obtained with FeCoNC-at catalyst in an earlier investigation, where otherwise similar conditions to the present study were used [44]. Also, more than two times higher Pmax of FeCoNC-at compared to the Fe/Co/IL-CNF-800b could not be solely caused by the catalysts ORR activity as in the kinetically controlled region remarkably closer current density values at 0.85 V (J0.85V) around 60 mA cm -2 were observed for both catalysts.…”
Section: Aemfc Testingsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…Also, more than two times higher Pmax of FeCoNC-at compared to the Fe/Co/IL-CNF-800b could not be solely caused by the catalysts ORR activity as in the kinetically controlled region remarkably closer current density values at 0.85 V (J0.85V) around 60 mA cm -2 were observed for both catalysts. Furthermore, more negative E1/2 value was observed in the case of FeCoNC-at (-0.18 V) compared to Fe/Co/IL-CNF-800b (-0.15 V) during the RDE experiments in 0.1 M KOH [44]. In Table 4, the NPMCs showing higher Pmax values than FeCoNC-at have all been obtained with laboratory AEMs that are not commercially available.…”
Section: Aemfc Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various research groups have extensively studied the development of new catalysts via the incorporation of one, two, or more doping agents with carbon sources. Examples of doping atoms of interest are N, P, S, and B, which may be introduced with precursors via different methods [15,51]. In this way, various doped carbons can be synthesized by altering the ratio of the precursors to initial carbon source(s) [15].…”
Section: Doping Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, these Pt catalysts also suffer from long term degradation and instability [14]. Pt has other recorded shortfalls such as toxicity and methanol poisoning [15,16]. These disadvantages, coupled with the low utilization of The cathodic oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) makes up one of the two half reactions necessary for fuel cell device operation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation