1982
DOI: 10.1016/0010-2180(82)90117-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transition from laminar to turbulent free jet diffusion flames

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Further increase in the Reynolds number causes the transition plane to move closer to the jet exit. The trend of decreasing normalized flow transition length (i.e., the distance from the jet exit to the transition plane divided by the tube inside diameter) with increasing Reynolds number is consistent with similar observations in low-density gas jet by Subbarao and Cantwell (1992), Takano and Kotani (1978), and Takahashi et al (1982). In the lower set of schlieren images in Fig.…”
Section: Transition From Laminar To Turbulent Flowsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Further increase in the Reynolds number causes the transition plane to move closer to the jet exit. The trend of decreasing normalized flow transition length (i.e., the distance from the jet exit to the transition plane divided by the tube inside diameter) with increasing Reynolds number is consistent with similar observations in low-density gas jet by Subbarao and Cantwell (1992), Takano and Kotani (1978), and Takahashi et al (1982). In the lower set of schlieren images in Fig.…”
Section: Transition From Laminar To Turbulent Flowsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Jet tubes with d=14.5mm (case 1) and 10.5mm (case 2) were used to obtain jet Richardson number of 0.02 and 0.008, respectively, in Earth gravity. The buoyancy is generally neglected for Ricou and Spalding, 1961;Takahashi et al, 1982). In this study, P was computed using the normalized transition Earth gravity and at z/d=5.5 in microgravity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Takeno and Kotani [3] and Takahashi et al [4] have reported large temporal fluctuations in breakpoint length of hydrogen jet diffusion flames. They attributed the scatter in the breakpoint length to the transient change in the fluctuation level in the laminar jet.…”
Section: Intermittent Breakpoint Lengthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…a Mechanism of transition of pure hydrogen flame (A break point of inner fuel jet, B break point of outer flame zone; Re=1,870, d=1.42 mm) [4]. b Inner and outer vortical structures in a methane jet diffusion flame using Mie scattering technique (Re=2,390, d=10 mm nozzle) [9] gravity however affected the near-field laminar flame structure as well as the breakpoint length, even for momentum-dominated fuel jets with Re=1,500 to 2,100, V=65 to 490 m/s.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%