2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2013
DOI: 10.1109/hicss.2013.574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transition Discovery of Sequential Behaviors in Email Application Usage Using Hidden Markov Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The software finds the difference of the models to characterize the change: dλ/dt = (λ 2 -λ 1 ) / (t 2 -t 1 ). If the difference Δλ is significant, by some measure, then we have found a transition point [22].…”
Section: Model Differencingmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The software finds the difference of the models to characterize the change: dλ/dt = (λ 2 -λ 1 ) / (t 2 -t 1 ). If the difference Δλ is significant, by some measure, then we have found a transition point [22].…”
Section: Model Differencingmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The first column presents the concepts, which are defined in the second column, while the third column presents representative references. Simple difference metrics [38]; Markov probability distribution differences [22] 5 Aggregate sequential behavior transition diagnosis…”
Section: Sequence Stream-mining Tool Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Papers in this theme focused mainly on human performance improvement, assessment, and technologies, which affect the way organizations build healthcare systems today (Juric, Kim, Panneerselvam, & Tesanovic, 2017). Research topics came from a wide variety of HIT implementation areas such as the modeling of HIT users' behavioral changes (Robinson, Akhlaghi, & Deng, 2013), HIT for process management , and the development of effective healthcare apps on mobile operating platforms (Agarwal et al, 2013). The HIT architectures and implementation theme focused mainly on the architecture and implementation of HIT and, thus, on topics such as personalized medicine (Israelson & Cankaya, 2012;Bravhar & Juric, 2017), predictive HIT (Abidi, Cox, Shepherd, & Abidi, 2012;Rudra, Li, & Kavaki, 2012), HIT for drug administration (Bravhar & Juric, 2017), smart healthcare (Haghigh, Zaslavsky, Krishnaswamy, & Gaber, 2009;Mauro, Sunyaev, Leimeister, Schweiger, & Krcmar, 2008;Green & Young, 2008;Clarke & Steele, 2014), and tracking HIT (e.g., Ryan, Doster, Daily, & Lewis, 2016).…”
Section: Hit Architectures and Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%