Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Finite-State Methods and Natural Language Processing 2019
DOI: 10.18653/v1/w19-3115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transition-Based Coding and Formal Language Theory for Ordered Digraphs

Abstract: Transition-based parsing of natural language uses transition systems to build directed annotation graphs (digraphs) for sentences. In this paper, we define, for an arbitrary ordered digraph, a unique decomposition and a corresponding linear encoding that are associated bijectively with each other via a new transition system. These results give us an efficient and succinct representation for digraphs and sets of digraphs. Based on the system and our analysis of its syntactic properties, we give structural bound… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is follow-up work that extends the encoding developed in this paper to all ordered digraphs (Yli-Jyrä 2019).…”
Section: Extensibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is follow-up work that extends the encoding developed in this paper to all ordered digraphs (Yli-Jyrä 2019).…”
Section: Extensibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although computational finite-state methods are normally associated with segmental models, the mappings in question do not necessarily have to be segmental, or string-based. Many techniques exist for producing string representations of structured information such as autosegmental models (Bird 1995, Yli-Jyrä 2013, Hulden 2015), hence what is said below will apply to a number of domains, although the focus is on models such as Optimality Theory (OT), Lexical Phonology and Morphology and general rewrite-rule models, which can be interpreted as bidirectional string-to-string translations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%