The global economy has been faced with two dramatic crises (the global
financial crisis and the pandemic), and it is still suffering. As an answer
to the first crisis, the European Union formulated reindustrialization as a
development approach, by which it wanted to strengthen its position on the
world market, with the aim of manufacturing achieving a 1/5 share of the
GDP. During the last decade, results have differed among the member
countries, as well among the candidates for membership. Some countries have
continued the trend of deindustrialization, while others have succeeded in
starting reindustrialization. However, what is clear is the fact that
achieving the goal defined is a challenge for all. There are economists who
argue that this goal is not only unrealistic, but even not useful. The paper
presents a comparative analysis exploring the development characteristics of
several countries in South-Eastern Europe (SEE): Albania, Bosnia and
Herzegovina, Croatia, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Kosovo and Serbia, using
a meta-analysis in a synthesis of the results of this empirical research. It
also shows a regression analysis and correlation analysis using the IBM
SPSPS 28 software package. The paper analyzes whether the countries
considered follow the trend of deindustrialization or reindustrialization,
and it examines and tests whether a higher share of manufacturing within the
GDP results in a higher rate of growth. The results show that all the
countries under consideration have already fulfilled the aim of
manufacturing having a 20% share of their GDP (except Montenegro). At the
same time all of the countries, except two (Bosnia and Herzegovina and North
Macedonia), have experienced a deindustrialization trend. The paper could be
useful for policy makers in South-Eastern European Countries as well other
transitory/transitional countries as they create reindustrialization
policies in line with the EU industrial policy.