2002
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.320246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transition and Agriculture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
(56 reference statements)
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As suggested by my analysis of TVEs and local corporatism along the theme of dual‐track reform paradigm, it is reasonable to argue that the gradualist path may be more appropriate for the initial phase of economic transition, while the big‐bang path may be imperative for the later phase. In this sense, my argument echoes the views that it is irrelevant (Oi, 1999), simplistic (Rozelle and Swinnen, 2003) and misleading (Jin and Haynes, 1997) to consider the gradualist and big‐bang policies as mutually exclusive. China's experience seems to suggest that an integration of both gradualist and big‐bang approaches may be necessary, with the gradualist policy for the initial phase and the big‐bang policy for the later phase, rather than two mutually exclusive paths.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As suggested by my analysis of TVEs and local corporatism along the theme of dual‐track reform paradigm, it is reasonable to argue that the gradualist path may be more appropriate for the initial phase of economic transition, while the big‐bang path may be imperative for the later phase. In this sense, my argument echoes the views that it is irrelevant (Oi, 1999), simplistic (Rozelle and Swinnen, 2003) and misleading (Jin and Haynes, 1997) to consider the gradualist and big‐bang policies as mutually exclusive. China's experience seems to suggest that an integration of both gradualist and big‐bang approaches may be necessary, with the gradualist policy for the initial phase and the big‐bang policy for the later phase, rather than two mutually exclusive paths.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Recognizing the strengths and limitations of each competing view, my analysis suggests a possible third view that considers both approaches as equally valid for two different phases (cf. Rozelle and Swinnen, 2003). As suggested by my analysis of TVEs and local corporatism along the theme of dual‐track reform paradigm, it is reasonable to argue that the gradualist path may be more appropriate for the initial phase of economic transition, while the big‐bang path may be imperative for the later phase.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Además de esto, al no existir la intervención del Estado en procesos administrativos de asignación de tierras se dispone de mayores recursos para la inversión en infraestructura, favoreciendo la productividad. (Ver Deininger, Jin, Adenew, Gebre-Selassie, & Demeke, 2003;Deininger & Mpuga, 2002;Rozelle & Swinnen, 2003).…”
Section: El Diagnóstico Del Banco Mundialunclassified