Transit Users’ Mode Choice Behavior During Light Rail Transit Short-Term Planned Service Disruption

Abstract

Planned service disruptions (PSDs) of light rail transit (LRT) improve service reliability, extend infrastructure’s life, and reduce the frequency and impact of unplanned service disruption caused by system failure. However, the literature on the impact of LRT PSDs on transit customers’ travel mode choice behavior is scarce relative to that on unplanned service disruptions. This study aimed to investigate transit customers’ mode choice behavior in response to short-term LRT PSD in the City of Calgary, AB, Canada. A stated preference survey was designed to gather respondents’ mode choices under a set of hypothetical scenarios. A mixed multinomial logit model was estimated using stated preference data. Findings of this study include: (i) stated LRT ridership dropped by about 35% during the examined short-term LRT service disruption; (ii) transit customers who hold a LRT payment pass (monthly, subsidized seniors, low income, and students) and are frequent weekend LRT users are more likely to stay with the LRT mode in case of short-term PSD; (iii) the value of time for transit users during short-term LRT PSD was found to be 11.76 $/h and 13.0 $/h for travel time (excluding wait time) and wait time during travel, respectively. A sensitivity analysis was conducted on key variables to predict choice probabilities of transit alternatives. Recommendations are made to improve Calgary Transit customers’ experience during short-term LRT PSDs.

Shuttle Bus Timetable Adjustment in Response to Behind-Schedule Commuter Railway Disturbance

“…Especially, the headway cannot exceed the duration of each subprocess. Constraint (11) states that the bus can depart from the origin station only if meeting the headway of the subprocess. Constraint (12) calculates the waiting time of passengers at the origin station, which depends on the time-window between the arrival time at origin station and the boarding time.…”

“…As long as there are neither disturbances nor disruptions, commuter railway routes and schedule-based timetables can be considered reliable with unwavering certainty; execution is precisely as planned. However, in real life operations, disturbances and disruptions are inevitable [10][11][12]. Cacchiani et al [13] elaborate on two distinctive differences between the characteristics of "disturbances" and "disruptions".…”

Analysis of the Influence and Propagation Law of Urban Rail Transit Disruptions: A Case Study of Beijing Rail Transit

“…Li et al [16] established multiple logistic regression models to analyze passenger travel behavior during emergencies. Arslan Asim et al [20] constructed a mixed multinomial logit model to investigate transit customers' mode choice behavior during light rail transit short-term planned service disruption. The behavior of passengers may differ depending on the property and the extent of the disruption.…”