2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2005.07.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transient tetraplegia after cervical facet joint injection for chronic neck pain administered without imaging guidance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A success rate of up to 91% has been noted in temporarily relieving cervical axial pain following intra-articular and perifacetal injections [11]. The importance of performing these injections under imaging control for accurate localisation needs no emphasis [6]. The most common levels involved in cervical spondylosis and hence indicated for facet infiltrations are the lower cervical levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A success rate of up to 91% has been noted in temporarily relieving cervical axial pain following intra-articular and perifacetal injections [11]. The importance of performing these injections under imaging control for accurate localisation needs no emphasis [6]. The most common levels involved in cervical spondylosis and hence indicated for facet infiltrations are the lower cervical levels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the facet joints are deeply located and cannot be accessed using anatomic landmarks, radiologic guidance under fluoroscopy or less commonly under CT has been routinely required for all facet injection procedures to maximize medication placement success and to avoid neurovascular complications [55][56][57][58][59]. Cohen et al has reported a 7 % incidence of unintentional intravascular injection during fluoroscopy-guided cervical medial branch block.…”
Section: Facet Joint Injectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15,16 However, I am aware of a few cases of serious neurologic complications after cervical medial branch block that have not been formally reported. In these cases, injection into a radicular or anastamosing artery was presumed to be the mechanism for an associated untoward outcome.…”
Section: Performing Cervical Medial Branch Block Using the Short-axismentioning
confidence: 99%