2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15580-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transient stripping of subducting slabs controls periodic forearc uplift

Abstract: Topography in forearc regions reflects tectonic processes along the subduction interface, from seismic cycle-related transients to long-term competition between accretion and erosion. Yet, no consensus exists about the topography drivers, especially as the contribution of deep accretion remains poorly constrained. Here, we use thermo-mechanical simulations to show that transient slab-top stripping events at the base of the forearc crust control upliftthen-subsidence sequences. This 100s-m-high topographic sign… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
76
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
6
76
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Noda (2016) proposed a classification of forearcs that is, particularly useful here to classify patterns of surface uplift rates, U struct , that result from the structural growth of the forearc, excluding the earthquake cycle. Forearcs can be categorized according to two characteristics: from extensional to contractional and from erosional to accretionary (with respect to mass fluxes across the subduction channel, not surface processes, Clift & Vannucchi, 2004; Menant et al., 2020; von Huene & Lallemand, 1990). Most forearc systems are either extensional and erosional or contractional and accretionary (Noda, 2016).…”
Section: A Model For Active Margin Shelvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Noda (2016) proposed a classification of forearcs that is, particularly useful here to classify patterns of surface uplift rates, U struct , that result from the structural growth of the forearc, excluding the earthquake cycle. Forearcs can be categorized according to two characteristics: from extensional to contractional and from erosional to accretionary (with respect to mass fluxes across the subduction channel, not surface processes, Clift & Vannucchi, 2004; Menant et al., 2020; von Huene & Lallemand, 1990). Most forearc systems are either extensional and erosional or contractional and accretionary (Noda, 2016).…”
Section: A Model For Active Margin Shelvesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, Menant et al (2019Menant et al ( , 2020 presented mantle-scale thermo-mechanical experiments focusing on the dynamics along the subduction interface and deep basal accretion. They argued that periodic underplating and the formation of thick duplex structures develop related to fluid-driven stress changes along the subduction interface beneath the accretionary wedge (Menant et al, 2019).…”
Section: Research Papermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When uplifted rocks get exposed, erosion removes material from the top and thins the affected part. Furthermore, underplating-related steepening of the overall surface taper may eventually result in gravitational collapse and extensional tectonics above the affected region (Menant et al, 2020;Platt, 1986;Ruh, 2017). In this sense, both underplating and surface removal of material contribute to the overall wedge taper, which mechanically maintains a value between its critical minimum and maximum (Dahlen and Suppe, 1988).…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thickness of sediment in the trench is an additional controlling factor on forearc architecture that may determine which areas of the continental margin are subjected to subduction erosion or accretion (Hilde, 1983;Cloos and Shreve, 1988;Menant et al, 2020). Our data shows that the accretionary part of the WSC (south of the intersection with the Juan Fernandez Ridge at 32.9°S) displays faster median uplift rates of 0.26 m/ka than in the rest of the WSC (Fig.…”
Section: Tectonic Controls On Coastal Uplift Ratesmentioning
confidence: 67%