2018
DOI: 10.1177/2041669518754595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transient Signals and Inattentional Blindness in a Multi-object Tracking Task

Abstract: Inattentional blindness is a failure to notice an unexpected event when attention is directed elsewhere. The current study examined participants’ awareness of an unexpected object that maintained luminance contrast, switched the luminance once, or repetitively flashed. One hundred twenty participants performed a dynamic tracking task on a computer monitor for which they were instructed to count the number of movement deflections of an attended set of objects while ignoring other objects. On the critical trial,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a factor can play a role in other animal models, with honeybees preferencing 20 -25 Hz visual flicker and avoiding 2-4 Hz (Van De Poll et al, 2015). Even a single luminance change is enough to break inattentional blindness in humans (Palmer et al, 2018). To minimize this possibility, we distributed the two tagging frequencies across two spatial locations (T 1 and T 2 ) as well as testing our entire experimental paradigm at two different frequency tagged pairs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a factor can play a role in other animal models, with honeybees preferencing 20 -25 Hz visual flicker and avoiding 2-4 Hz (Van De Poll et al, 2015). Even a single luminance change is enough to break inattentional blindness in humans (Palmer et al, 2018). To minimize this possibility, we distributed the two tagging frequencies across two spatial locations (T 1 and T 2 ) as well as testing our entire experimental paradigm at two different frequency tagged pairs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such a factor can play a role in other animalmodels, with honeybees preferencing 20-25 Hz and avoiding 2-4 Hz visual flicker (Van De Poll et al, 2015). Even a single luminance change is enough to break inattentional blindness in humans(Palmer et al, 2018). To minimise this possibility, we distributed the two tagging frequencies across the two spatial locations (T1 and T2) as well as testing our entire experimental paradigm at two different frequency-tagged pairs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%