2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2016.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Transient response of steel plates subjected to close proximity explosive detonations in air

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
51
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…membrane or combine bending and membrane). In the second category, the results of each pattern of motion were compared against the available experimental data on the effect of stand-off on blast phenomenon by Jacob et al [57], using mild steel plates, as well as those of Langdon et al [58], [59] on blast protection armour steel plates. In addition, the numerical results of [60] are investigated for a comparative study.…”
Section: Validations Of the Theoretical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…membrane or combine bending and membrane). In the second category, the results of each pattern of motion were compared against the available experimental data on the effect of stand-off on blast phenomenon by Jacob et al [57], using mild steel plates, as well as those of Langdon et al [58], [59] on blast protection armour steel plates. In addition, the numerical results of [60] are investigated for a comparative study.…”
Section: Validations Of the Theoretical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both studies employed PE4 disc explosive to generate the blast wave pressure. Details of these studies have been discussed elsewhere [58], [59], thus only the results of interest are presented here for validations.…”
Section: Validations Of the Theoretical Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'s [33], and [35] in Blast Impact and Survivability Research Unit at the University of Cape Town the details of which could be found in the literature, however; a brief description of the tests is given here. Air blast load was generated by the blast chamber facility through detonating disk explosives of PE4 using MA2A3 electrical detonator, which was in turn mounted on a polystyrene bridge to provide the desired stand-off by varying the lengths of bridge legs (Fig.…”
Section: Description Of Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Full description of the experimental setup is given in Ref. 's [7], and [35], including experimental tests with various charge masses and with a horizontal pendulum. Table 2 summarises the experimental tests selected for this study.…”
Section: Description Of Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the existing finding's shown, structures subjected to unconfined and confined explosion bears different blast loads and their dynamic responses are different [1]. Under unconfined blast, the structure performs different dynamic response which hugely depends on the explosive source distance (i.e., close-in airblast [2], and faraway airblast), shield materials (i.e. thin aluminium, steel plates [3]) as well as the structure patterns.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%